Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #134103
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | minforth <minforth@gmx.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters |
| Date | Tue, 29 Jul 2025 06:03:56 +0200 |
| Lines | 15 |
| Message-ID | <meqvhdF9vuiU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <871pq0uppw.fsf@nightsong.com> <nnd$36fa8656$3dede2e2@f9f97ec4bf262c4d> <87wm7ru0y4.fsf@nightsong.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net iW/910F7v/WGywIn7gTdQAcEZPG8q20Y0D+qp1qeHWDVbdSbIJ |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:OJY3R15CDMAYKLeYj96UpNeQzkY= sha256:ZNkSA4x5hvm2wbLXoVkZC+Kv2fjJ74QhVAtELXLEfdM= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla Thunderbird |
| In-Reply-To | <87wm7ru0y4.fsf@nightsong.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.forth:134103 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Am 29.07.2025 um 05:32 schrieb Paul Rubin: > albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl writes: >> The other situation is that you take advantage of multiple cores >> to speed up the calculation. There you use the fork system call. > > The idea here is to multitask on an MCU with around 2kB of memory, so no > OS. Just a few tasks to monitor a pushbutton, control a LED, and some > similar things. The scheduler will require a base clock interrrupt, say every 10 millisecs. Other interrupts can fill a request queue which is handled by the scheduler. Details are VERY hardware specific. You may be interested in: https://codeberg.org/clausecker/mecrisp-stellaris
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
multitasking vs multiple interpreters Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-07-28 11:36 -0700
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-07-28 23:09 +0200
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-07-28 20:32 -0700
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters minforth <minforth@gmx.net> - 2025-07-29 06:03 +0200
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-09 14:37 +0000
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-29 07:49 +0000
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-07-29 11:06 +0200
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-07-29 15:06 -0700
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-11 10:12 -0700
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-11 17:49 +0000
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-08-12 13:14 +0200
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-12 09:45 -0700
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-08-13 11:23 +0200
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-13 09:12 -0700
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters minforth <minforth@gmx.net> - 2025-08-13 13:55 +0200
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Stephen Pelc <stephen@vfxforth.com> - 2025-08-14 09:43 +0000
csiph-web