Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #134109
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters |
| Date | 2025-07-29 15:06 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87seietzwn.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink) |
| References | <871pq0uppw.fsf@nightsong.com> <2025Jul29.094901@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> |
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes: > Concerning the idea of replicating all variables and buffers in each > task, that seemed too expensive in memory for Gforth No no, they wouldn't be replicated. Each task would have its very own data dictionary with its own variables. Immutable data like code and constants could be shared, but even then, that sharing wouldn't be apparent to the application code. There are actually a couple of applications I'm considering this for. One is a flashlight (toykeeper.net/anduril) using a small MCU. The other is a battery controller, whose CPU is probably larger, but I don't know at the moment what it is. Both applications are written in C (not by me) and the idea is to extend them with a small Forth.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
multitasking vs multiple interpreters Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-07-28 11:36 -0700
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-07-28 23:09 +0200
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-07-28 20:32 -0700
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters minforth <minforth@gmx.net> - 2025-07-29 06:03 +0200
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-09 14:37 +0000
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-07-29 07:49 +0000
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-07-29 11:06 +0200
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-07-29 15:06 -0700
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-11 10:12 -0700
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-08-11 17:49 +0000
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-08-12 13:14 +0200
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-12 09:45 -0700
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-08-13 11:23 +0200
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-13 09:12 -0700
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters minforth <minforth@gmx.net> - 2025-08-13 13:55 +0200
Re: multitasking vs multiple interpreters Stephen Pelc <stephen@vfxforth.com> - 2025-08-14 09:43 +0000
csiph-web