Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #1696
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| From | Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> |
| Subject | Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays |
| Date | 2011-05-02 12:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lkkhf1.ebs@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> (permalink) |
| Organization | Dutch Forth Workshop |
| References | <853c5ae6-879d-4e83-ba88-ebaee2894ea7@a12g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <dd08c476-df9c-4480-84b4-410623a0dbc9@j16g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <lk9bli.b13@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> <2195d916-e3ca-4c72-b5f4-30ccb6211471@i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com> |
In article <2195d916-e3ca-4c72-b5f4-30ccb6211471@i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, foxchip <fox@ultratechnology.com> wrote: >On Apr 26, 3:22=A0am, Albert van der Horst <alb...@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> >wrote: >> >I found this very helpful when I spent a couple of days creating Please note: this happened a few years ago. >> >the talking voltmeter demo that used five nodes. =A0I loaded programs > >> That would tell me there is some seriously wrong in the >> marketing department. > >You don't seem to pay a lot of attention to details like >who did what or when on what or at which company or how >it worked or how simple some things are that seem like >miracles to you. No, I don't pay much attention to details in your long repetitious posts. They tend to be vague and, may I say so, overly pretentious. Still a talking voltmeter should have drawn my attention. > >> Instead of making the world understand that this chip can >> do a crystal oscillator with just the crystal (even if it >> must be very low frequency), you embark on new projects. > >That reference was a different company, different compiler, >different application, and being done years ago you have >things going backwards in time since it is hard to "embark >on new projects" that were actually done in a few day and >a few years ago. I think you should have at least have mentioned that it was done in a different company, with a different compiler. So we could draw the conclusion that it was hardly relevant. Can you at least comment on how good this project will run on the Green Array chips? If you are not working on the crystal oscillator and not on the talking Voltmeter, what are you working on lately? > >> Its like with Jezus. A small miracle like turning water >> into wine is very convincing, if it happens before your >> very eyes. > >I think the crystal example is a good easy project for >children to do as a learning exercise for starters with >limited understanding and background. You shouldn't downplay the wine miracle. It knocked people off their socks, because they didn't understand how Jesus did it. The understanding of children nowadays would have impressed Greek philosophers, but they have been taught, which is different from inventing. This is a silly rationalisation of a decision not to beef up the crystal document. From a marketing point of view this decision is weird, if not indefensible. Unless, of course, Green Arrays can't. That is what the world thinks. What I think is that a practical circuit with a 10 Mhz crystal is definitively non-trivial. > >Best Wishes Groetjes Albert -- -- Albert van der Horst, UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS Economic growth -- being exponential -- ultimately falters. albert@spe&ar&c.xs4all.nl &=n http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
More Thoughts on Green Arrays rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2011-04-09 10:44 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays "Greg Bailey" <greg@GreenArrayChips.com> - 2011-04-09 17:53 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-10 14:53 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays "Greg Bailey" <greg@greenarraychips.com> - 2011-04-11 10:18 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Brad <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 14:44 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Brad <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 17:11 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 21:41 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-12 00:06 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 06:22 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Charley Shattuck <cshattuck@surewest.net> - 2011-04-17 21:11 +0000
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2011-04-17 14:53 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-19 21:13 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-04-20 17:42 +0000
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-23 04:03 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays foxchip <fox@ultratechnology.com> - 2011-04-23 23:10 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-25 09:00 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 17:10 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays foxchip <fox@ultratechnology.com> - 2011-05-01 10:37 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-02 00:14 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays foxchip <fox@ultratechnology.com> - 2011-05-02 08:20 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-03 21:26 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays "Greg Bailey" <greg@greenarraychips.com> - 2011-05-07 20:11 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays "Greg Bailey" <greg@greenarraychips.com> - 2011-05-08 22:35 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-09 08:11 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-04-26 11:22 +0000
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays foxchip <fox@ultratechnology.com> - 2011-05-01 10:05 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-05-02 12:01 +0000
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays foxchip <fox@ultratechnology.com> - 2011-05-02 07:51 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays "Greg Bailey" <greg@greenarraychips.com> - 2011-05-08 22:23 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 23:17 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-17 20:41 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 21:38 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-19 22:20 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2011-04-20 00:56 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-20 23:02 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2011-04-22 10:32 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2011-04-22 22:06 +0200
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2011-04-23 18:42 -0700
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2011-04-23 12:17 +0100
Re: More Thoughts on Green Arrays Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-04-26 11:03 +0000
csiph-web