Re: Valid code?

From	"Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Valid code?
Date	2013-03-26 20:28 -0400
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<kiteab$f8f$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<kini71$te9$1@speranza.aioe.org> <kip62u$287$1@dont-email.me> <kisi9g$srg$1@speranza.aioe.org> <kismf2$9j5$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

"Gerry Jackson" <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:kismf2$9j5$1@dont-email.me...
> On 26/03/2013 16:29, Rod Pemberton wrote:
> > "Gerry Jackson" <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in
message
> > news:kip62u$287$1@dont-email.me...

> >> Which Forths didn't?
> >
> > Win32Forth v6.14.00
> > Win32Forth v6.14.02
>
> Yes I know old versions of Win32Forth failed at recursing
> :noname definitions. They seem to have fixed it in version
> 6.15.0 build 7.

Old version?  I just downloaded v6.14.02 from Sourceforge.
Technically, it's the current version.

6.14.02 is the latest stable release on Sourceforge,
released March 9th 2013.

6.15.01 is the latest developmental release on Sourceforge,
released March 10th 2013.

I'm not sure where someone could locate 6.15.07 ...

Rod Pemberton

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Valid code? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-03-24 14:57 -0400
  Re:Valid code? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-03-24 21:04 +0100
    Re: Valid code? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-03-25 02:17 +0000
  Re: Valid code? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-24 13:04 -0700
    Re: Valid code? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-24 21:31 +0100
      Re: Valid code? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-24 14:09 -0700
  Re:Valid code? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-03-24 21:10 +0100
  Re: Valid code? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-03-25 09:43 +0000
    Re: Valid code? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-03-26 12:29 -0400
      Re: Valid code? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-03-26 17:41 +0000
        Re: Valid code? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-03-26 20:28 -0400
          Re: Valid code? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-03-27 07:31 +0000
            Re: Valid code? George Hubert <georgeahubert@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-03-27 02:02 -0700
              Re: Valid code? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-03-27 10:14 +0000
                Re: Valid code? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-03-27 12:37 +0000
                Re: Valid code? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-03-27 14:27 +0000
  Re: Valid code? Sieur de Bienville <morrimichael@gmail.com> - 2013-03-25 18:59 -0700

csiph-web