Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #18077
| From | "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotz.cnm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: RfC: Foreword |
| Date | 2012-12-18 19:24 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <kar1fa$lbf$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <op.wpg7mlkhsu5d0p@david> <50d01afd$0$6568$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <7-2dnZv2HNDNtU3NnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@supernews.com> <50d0c624$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <vPydnd-kvNtmVE3NnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@supernews.com> |
"Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> wrote in message news:vPydnd-kvNtmVE3NnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@supernews.com... ... > The problem is, that there is *no* technical distinction > between system and program in Forth! That is one of its > strengths, actually. > Non-separation of the OS and applications is usually considered to be an attack vector. Strong separation of the two is what secure OSes implement. I.e., the access to OS components and their powerful features allows malicious intent to be realized. > All of the I/O, compiler tools, and other building blocks > are available to programmers to use in their applications, > and many do. > That's called a security breach in waiting. Rod Pemberton
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RfC: Foreword "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-12-17 19:40 +0000
Re: Foreword "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotz.cnm> - 2012-12-17 17:40 -0500
Re: Foreword "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-12-17 21:55 -1000
Re: Foreword "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotz.cnm> - 2012-12-18 19:22 -0500
Re: Foreword Peter Knaggs <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-12-19 10:03 +0000
Re: Foreword "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotz.cnm> - 2012-12-21 02:39 -0500
Re: Foreword "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-12-20 22:16 -1000
Re: Foreword rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-12-19 16:09 -0500
Re: Foreword "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotz.cnm> - 2012-12-21 02:20 -0500
Re: Foreword "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-12-23 00:43 +1100
Re: Foreword "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-12-22 16:44 +0100
Re: Foreword "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-12-27 19:54 +1100
Re: Foreword Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-12-27 05:36 -0800
Re: Foreword Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-12-27 05:40 -0800
Re: Foreword Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-12-22 10:07 -0600
Re: RfC: Foreword "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-12-18 08:27 +0100
Re: RfC: Foreword Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2012-12-17 22:24 -1000
Re: RfC: Foreword "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-12-18 20:38 +0100
Re: RfC: Foreword "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-12-18 09:54 -1000
Re: RfC: Foreword "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-12-18 22:00 +0100
Re: RfC: Foreword "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-12-18 11:21 -1000
Re: RfC: Foreword "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-12-20 07:56 +0100
Re: RfC: Foreword Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-12-20 03:38 -0600
Re: RfC: Foreword "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotz.cnm> - 2012-12-21 02:20 -0500
Re: RfC: Foreword Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-12-21 04:02 -0600
Re: RfC: Foreword "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotz.cnm> - 2012-12-18 19:24 -0500
Re: RfC: Foreword Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-12-18 22:46 -0800
Re: RfC: Foreword "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotz.cnm> - 2012-12-21 02:21 -0500
Re: RfC: Foreword Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-12-21 15:24 -0800
csiph-web