Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #7963
| From | "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: dot-quote implementation question |
| Date | 2011-12-12 05:04 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <jc4jg3$arh$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <jbvc6f$9ho$1@speranza.aioe.org> <2011Dec10.130036@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <jc13ba$cpv$1@speranza.aioe.org> <HJqdneRGLvDg53nTnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@supernews.com> |
"Andrew Haley" <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> wrote in message news:HJqdneRGLvDg53nTnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@supernews.com... > Rod Pemberton <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> wrote: > > > > Do you (or anyone else) think string variables are useful functionality? > > Sometimes. > > > Missing functionality? > > Missing from what? You want one, define one. How is a string > variable going to be any different from create ... allot ? It would be a true variable and it would need a CFA routine, like DOCON or DOVAR etc, e.g., say DOSTR or somesuch ... That functionality is not present in Forth, i.e., missing functionality. Current functionality is close for string constants, but does not use a CFA routine. A true string variable would only be a string variable, like words created by CONSTANT or VARIABLE. Currently, string constants in Forth can be compiled into any word. So, there would probably be a word, say STRING, to create a string variable that would store DOSTR in the CFA field. A word created with STRING could only hold a string, just like a word created by CONSTANT or VARIABLE can only hold integer constants and variables. Rod Pemberton
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-10 05:28 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-12-10 12:00 +0000
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-10 06:52 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-10 21:10 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2011-12-11 08:59 +0100
Re: dot-quote implementation question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-12-11 03:40 -0600
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-12 05:04 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-12-12 04:56 -0600
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-13 10:08 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-12 07:42 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-13 09:47 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-17 04:57 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-12-17 04:20 -0600
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-18 07:18 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-12-18 06:30 -0600
Re: dot-quote implementation question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-12-20 03:04 -0600
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-17 08:15 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-18 07:53 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-18 09:14 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-19 05:24 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-19 09:11 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-19 10:53 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2011-12-19 08:38 -1000
Re: dot-quote implementation question "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2011-12-19 21:34 +0100
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-19 12:51 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-18 10:16 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2011-12-18 08:18 -1000
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-19 05:25 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2011-12-19 22:23 +0100
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-20 10:53 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2011-12-20 19:58 +0100
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-20 11:44 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-21 16:16 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-20 11:50 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-21 14:56 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-21 21:49 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-18 14:33 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-19 05:26 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-19 09:38 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2011-12-19 08:49 -1000
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-19 13:04 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-20 10:57 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-20 12:23 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-20 14:27 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-21 16:14 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-21 14:53 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-21 21:48 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-21 22:02 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-29 03:39 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-29 12:37 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-30 13:31 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-30 11:12 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-31 05:52 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-31 11:33 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-31 20:10 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-31 19:12 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-01-04 05:13 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-01-04 12:49 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2011-12-22 00:55 +0100
Re: dot-quote implementation question Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-12-20 21:43 +0000
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-19 13:25 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-12-20 03:00 -0600
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-20 04:40 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-12-20 21:55 +0000
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-20 14:33 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-12-22 20:33 +0000
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-22 13:32 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-12-21 03:01 -0600
Re: dot-quote implementation question Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-12-22 20:38 +0000
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-20 10:53 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-20 10:49 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-20 08:20 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-20 04:49 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-20 10:58 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-21 08:41 -0800
Re: dot-quote implementation question "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-12-21 16:14 -0500
Re: dot-quote implementation question BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-12-21 15:14 -0800
Strings (was: dot-quote implementation question) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-12-11 10:33 +0000
Re: Strings (was: dot-quote implementation question) kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk - 2011-12-12 02:53 -0600
csiph-web