Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #132256
| From | mhx@iae.nl (mhx) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator |
| Date | 2024-09-19 06:33 +0000 |
| Organization | novaBBS |
| Message-ID | <a5254f7a5f00a0133c24e70330dabc04@www.novabbs.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <0d6fd7afead1708921d74f60970bcf62@www.novabbs.com> <2024Sep9.105514@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vbqob3$384u0$1@dont-email.me> <vc06v4$l19j$1@dont-email.me> <vcfr7j$91t8$1@dont-email.me> |
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 0:28:33 +0000, Krishna Myneni wrote: > On 9/12/24 21:10, Krishna Myneni wrote: [..] > A bit more involved test of the same 64-bit PRNGs starts to show the > possibility of defects in Marsaglia's 64-bit kiss prng (RAN-KISS) > compared to a simple 64-bit LCG prng (RANDOM). [..] I wonder if it is at all possible to really prove something about the PRNG *with tests of this type*. Intuition wants us to believe that the longer we run the simulation, the closer the result must match the expected outcome. Shouldn't we compute the probability that after a certain size run the result does NOT match the known result (given an ideal PRNG), or how unlikely it is that the result has a given error? Example: say the result of PRNG-a consistently has one of its bits (say bit 0) stuck at zero. Would the test under consideration detect this specific problem at all? -marcel
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2024-09-08 22:09 -0500
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2024-09-09 06:55 +0000
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-09-09 07:41 +0000
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2024-09-09 08:55 +0000
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-09-09 10:04 +0000
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-09-09 12:28 +0200
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2024-09-09 15:26 +0000
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-09-10 12:00 +0200
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2024-09-10 19:30 -0500
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2024-09-12 21:10 -0500
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2024-09-12 19:15 -0700
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-09-13 06:07 +0000
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2024-09-13 03:46 -0700
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator minforth@gmx.net (minforth) - 2024-09-13 06:56 +0000
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2024-09-18 19:28 -0500
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-09-19 06:33 +0000
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator minforth@gmx.net (minforth) - 2024-09-19 08:18 +0000
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2024-09-19 03:50 -0500
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-09-19 10:57 +0200
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2024-09-19 06:45 -0500
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2024-09-25 18:15 -0500
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2024-09-25 20:45 -0500
Re: KISS 64-bit pseudo-random number generator Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2024-09-09 18:36 -0500
csiph-web