Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.

From	mhx@iae.nl (mhx)
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question.
Date	2024-09-30 17:42 +0000
Organization	novaBBS
Message-ID	<912001cc0472ced53fde294b4fe9df82@novabbs.com> (permalink)
References	<nnd$0b021237$626a8881@55133cc8c31c4c51> <nnd$56a65fea$30328e9e@fe5292c2aea63e4d> <f9e2a709183796c9cee0d60d24b0cf89@www.novabbs.com> <nnd$70fe424a$27f9d60b@74640bc44a399edf> <d039b668ce34bd3330fcb4497d8649b7@novabbs.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 15:21:57 +0000, mhx wrote:

> On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 9:53:32 +0000, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote:
[..]
> FORTH> .TICKER-INFO
> AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor, timer & PROCESSOR-CLOCK of 4192MHz
> Peak WorkingSetSize    = 12075 kB
> Current WorkingSetSize = 631 kB
> Total memory size      = 31 GB
> Available memory size  = 16 GB
>
> The WorkingSetSize reflects the program's size + allocated memory.
> AFAIR, this was a lot worse a few years ago.
> Mysteriously, available memory size is still 16 GB.

Arrgh, this is not correct. 12075 kB is 12 MB, not 12 GB. The
workingsetsize increases, but the relation to allocated memory
is not obvious, nor is it clear that a larger Peak WorkingSetSize
means decreased allocation delays.

-marcel

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-09-23 14:18 +0200
  Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. David Schultz <david.schultz@earthlink.net> - 2024-09-23 08:27 -0500
    Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-09-24 11:47 +0200
      Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. Schlomo Goldberg <schlomo.goldberg@mailinator.com> - 2024-10-10 19:38 +0000
        Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-10-11 10:37 +0200
  Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2024-09-23 16:48 +0000
    Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-09-24 14:33 +0200
      Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2024-09-24 11:11 -0700
  Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-09-23 17:51 +0000
    Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. minforth@gmx.net (minforth) - 2024-09-23 18:19 +0000
      Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-09-23 19:10 +0000
        Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. minforth@gmx.net (minforth) - 2024-09-24 07:47 +0000
  Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-09-24 14:20 +0200
    Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2024-09-30 02:40 +0000
    Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-09-30 07:26 +0000
      Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-09-30 11:53 +0200
        Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-09-30 15:21 +0000
          Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-09-30 17:42 +0000
            Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-09-30 21:50 +0000
      Re: Memory trashing? Virtual memory question. John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-09-30 07:54 -0700

csiph-web