Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #132416
| From | dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT |
| Date | 2024-10-07 22:22 +1100 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <8195b3d00499f82168a805aaa3a0be86097a0cc4@i2pn2.org> (permalink) |
| References | <5c65a8f1fdfc3e9937a825842fe23dc2758f48ef@i2pn2.org> <ve0bit$1lo0q$1@dont-email.me> |
On 7/10/2024 9:02 pm, Ruvim wrote: > ... > Why do you prefer the order ( u.hour u.min u.sec ) rather than ( u.sec u.min u.hour ) ? > > The later order makes code simpler in (1) and (2), also, it follows the order of parameters in `TIME&DATE`. > > Moreover, if you want to convert three components to seconds, you need to reverse their order again: > > : time3-to-seconds ( u.hour u.min u.sec -- u.sec-total ) > swap rot 60 * + 60 * + > ; > > If the order of parameters is reversed, the above definition takes a simpler form: > > : time3-to-seconds ( u.sec u.min u.hour -- u.sec-total ) > 60 * + 60 * + > ; I thought it would be easier to convert to total secs (on 16-bit it has to be a double). But perhaps not.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Reverse SCAN SPLIT dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-10-07 19:52 +1100
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT melahi_ahmed@yahoo.fr (Ahmed) - 2024-10-07 09:55 +0000
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT melahi_ahmed@yahoo.fr (Ahmed) - 2024-10-07 10:03 +0000
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-10-07 23:07 +1100
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT melahi_ahmed@yahoo.fr (Ahmed) - 2024-10-07 19:25 +0000
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-10-08 13:58 +1100
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT melahi_ahmed@yahoo.fr (Ahmed) - 2024-10-08 06:02 +0000
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2024-10-07 14:02 +0400
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-10-07 22:22 +1100
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-10-07 23:13 +1100
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-10-10 17:00 +1100
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-10-10 10:00 +0200
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-10-10 20:57 +1100
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2024-10-16 18:13 +0200
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-10-17 10:28 +0200
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT minforth@gmx.net (minforth) - 2024-10-17 09:16 +0000
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-10-17 10:29 +0000
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-10-17 12:48 +0200
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-10-19 01:41 +1100
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-10-19 13:36 +0200
Re: Reverse SCAN SPLIT dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-10-18 12:10 +1100
csiph-web