Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22006
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: A new MISC forum? |
| Date | 2013-04-28 20:47 -0700 |
| Organization | Nightsong/Fort GNOX |
| Message-ID | <7xsj2am20t.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <65f0c3d4-13d5-4ad0-8d8d-22b0128ff408@dg5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> <7x8v435bfi.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <74304779-4ff7-4935-9148-91a65a87e5ec@lr6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> <7xehdu8ie9.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <de24090e-fff7-4d77-86ce-befaf12942a9@a15g2000pbu.googlegroups.com> |
Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> writes: > comp.lang.forth.hardware sounds good Yes, that would be a good choice if there was enough traffic to need a new group. I don't think there is that much traffic right now. There was one person grumbling about hardware posts very recently, but it hasn't been a problem in general as far as I know. Forth CPU's and stack hardware are a significant motivator for the Forth language these days, IMHO. So I consider Forth hardware to be on-topic for CLF until there's 100's of posts per day about it for sustained periods. I do realize others may see it differently. > Aim to open groups in preparation for product and development anyway, I agree with Rick: do the product first, worry about the venue later. > comp.lang.functional and comp.lang.haskell is that a spell checker > typo? Not as far as I can see. Comp.lang.functional was a fairly quiet group about functional-programming languages such as Haskell, ML, Erlang, and so on. One day someone got the bright idea that splitting off Haskell into its own group would increase traffic. Instead it decreased traffic, so now instead of one fairly quiet group, there are two dead groups.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
A new MISC forum? ". ." <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-27 10:07 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-27 18:21 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-27 20:37 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-27 21:04 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 00:14 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 00:38 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-28 01:03 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 07:24 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-28 14:17 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 20:14 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-28 20:47 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 22:56 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 23:00 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-29 01:35 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-29 02:26 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 17:45 -0400
ERROR ERROR t'was once [Re: A new MISC forum?] Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2013-04-28 17:53 -0500
Re: ERROR ERROR t'was once [Re: A new MISC forum?] rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-29 16:34 -0400
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 21:07 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-27 22:51 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-27 23:55 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 17:53 -0400
Re: A new MISC forum? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-28 15:24 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 22:29 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-01 18:33 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 21:23 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-01 22:14 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 00:12 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-04 12:51 -0400
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-05 00:40 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-05 17:51 -0400
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-06 00:49 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-06 11:31 -0400
Re: A new MISC forum? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 09:40 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 00:17 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 00:23 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 18:01 -0400
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 21:28 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 23:16 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2013-04-29 07:48 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-29 19:40 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-29 19:40 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-04-29 19:32 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-30 11:39 -0400
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 08:57 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-05-06 23:24 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 10:17 -0400
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 09:14 -0700
Re: A new MISC forum? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 09:52 -0700
csiph-web