Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #24393
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH |
| Date | 2013-07-11 07:26 -0700 |
| Organization | Nightsong/Fort GNOX |
| Message-ID | <7xa9ltuq8n.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> (permalink) |
| References | <9ed50be0-eda5-4513-b5e2-47eeac561c88@googlegroups.com> <85cdce78-3ea4-4016-8631-184cf448aded@googlegroups.com> |
attoampere@gmail.com writes: > of course paul rubin, i do not know forth terribly well.. but even if > this was the case, which it somehow is after an accident i suffered, i > can't imagine a better language to guide a complete beginner through. Well, this is a Forth newsgroup so we here generally like Forth in one way or another, but "best for beginners" is a subtler question. Forth's simplicity means you have to manage every detail of what your program is doing, that other languages take care of for you (e.g. dealing with character strings). Think of cars with manual gear shifts, vs. automatic transmissions. Some experienced drivers prefer manual shifting, others prefer automatics, it depends on the person and their style. But beginners are mostly (I guess there are exceptions) probably better off starting with automatics and trying manual later. Is your goal to explore Forth (that is fine) or do you just want to control your pipette robot? If you just want to run the robot, you may find it easier to start with something like Python (I'm not trying to specifically advocate Python, I only name it because I use it a lot myself; there's lots of other comparable languages). The protocol has enough complexity that keeping the program organized will take some thought and experience. I think it will be easier if languages and libraries are doing more of the work for you.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH attoampere@gmail.com - 2013-07-09 07:19 -0700
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2013-07-09 21:33 +0100
CRC was Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH all2001@spambog.com (Wolfgang Allinger) - 2013-07-09 19:30 -0400
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-09 12:05 -1000
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-09 17:59 -0700
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-09 21:03 -0700
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-09 17:47 -1000
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-10 00:09 -0700
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-10 01:57 -0700
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-10 12:00 +0000
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-10 07:47 -1000
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH attoampere@gmail.com - 2013-07-10 03:22 -0700
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-11 07:26 -0700
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-14 18:53 -1000
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-07-10 11:58 +0000
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-10 07:55 -1000
Re: ASCII Protocol implementations in FORTH rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-07-14 23:30 -0400
csiph-web