Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #132067
| From | mhx@iae.nl (mhx) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix |
| Date | 2024-08-30 06:30 +0000 |
| Organization | novaBBS |
| Message-ID | <77ea156ee1b693638011cfe1b9db7acd@www.novabbs.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <66d04731$1@news.ausics.net> <b551b3b6939980752fc024b73e3e722a@www.novabbs.com> <66d06bf8@news.ausics.net> <9abad5353f8d82a5af911c82bcd2d404@www.novabbs.com> <66d12ad7$1@news.ausics.net> |
On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 2:13:43 +0000, dxf wrote: [..] >> 3 set-precision ok >> -1e 0e 0.5e 0e z^ z. 0.0000000000000000612 + i1. ok [..] > Can't say without knowing what was the criteria. If a user wants > to show the result to 3 significant digits, who can argue with that. > 3 significant digits is about right for (ENG.) applications. When the user wants 3 significant digits according to the mathematical definition there is no discussion that SET-PRECISION is appropriate. If a system is to produce 100 Watts, and an approximate model of the losses returns 0.0000000000000000612 Watts, then that is quite probably not the wanted output (because it tells you the resolution of the floating point package, not the accuracy of the approximation). However, when that same model returns 100 Watts for the full output power, 100 or 100.0 is (probably) the expectation. Extra steps are needed to print the losses in a useful way, and those steps match perfectly with PLACES. PLACES would also work to print the full power as 100. It is not ideal, but the reason it is not ideal has nothing to do with SET-PRECISION . -marcel
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-08-29 01:32 +1000
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-08-29 20:02 +1000
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-08-29 10:39 +0000
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-08-29 22:39 +1000
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-08-29 14:23 +0000
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-08-30 12:13 +1000
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-08-30 06:30 +0000
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-08-30 18:03 +1000
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2024-08-30 08:26 +0000
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-08-30 19:24 +1000
Re: Display Engineering Notation with SI Prefix dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2024-08-31 11:11 +1000
csiph-web