Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #134926

Re: ciforth model

Date 2026-04-17 11:44 +1000
Subject Re: ciforth model
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
References <nnd$2bd819ed$5423e023@908ce2ca63477284>
From dxf <dxforth@gmail.com>
Message-ID <69e19091$1@news.ausics.net> (permalink)
Organization Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net

Show all headers | View raw


On 16/04/2026 11:38 pm, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote:
> ... 
> However we could squeeze for 16 bits, without logically affecting the model.
> 
> code field: one byte, an offset to a code area of 256 bytes.
> data field: 16 bit pointer
> name filed: 4 byte, 3 first and last char. Only 7 bits,
>             8th bit counts are flags
> flag field: hidden in the name
> link field: 256 bit offset, d.e. are at most 256 byte long.
> The total of 8 bytes will put even the original fig model to shame.

Don't know who was first but Fig-forth's variable length names is something
that Forth Inc and pretty much everyone adopted.  Moore attempted to defend
'3 chars plus count' but to no avail.  That ship had sailed.
 

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

ciforth model albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-04-16 15:38 +0200
  Re: ciforth model dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 11:44 +1000
    Re: ciforth model anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-04-17 07:29 +0000
      Re: ciforth model albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-04-17 12:10 +0200
        Re: ciforth model anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-04-18 10:26 +0000
          Re: ciforth model peter <peter.noreply@tin.it> - 2026-04-18 18:11 +0200
          Re: ciforth model albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-04-18 20:57 +0200
            Re: ciforth model anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-04-19 11:08 +0000
              Re: ciforth model albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-04-20 13:39 +0200
          Re: ciforth model peter <peter.noreply@tin.it> - 2026-05-21 10:28 +0200
            Re: ciforth model minforth <minforth@gmx.net> - 2026-05-22 12:04 +0200
      Re: ciforth model Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 19:39 +0200
      Re: ciforth model albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-04-22 22:48 +0200
        Re: ciforth model Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2026-04-24 10:38 -0700
          Re: ciforth model albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-04-25 11:54 +0200
            Re: ciforth model Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2026-04-25 13:22 -0700
              Re: ciforth model albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-04-26 14:05 +0200
  Re: ciforth model Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2026-04-17 00:27 -0700
    Re: ciforth model albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-04-17 12:13 +0200

csiph-web