Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #134760
| Date | 2026-03-21 13:22 +1100 |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: kForth-32 v 2.7.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| References | <10pie59$18nt5$1@dont-email.me> <10pjcap$1hho1$1@dont-email.me> |
| From | dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <69be0100@news.ausics.net> (permalink) |
| Organization | Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net |
On 20/03/2026 10:50 pm, Krishna Myneni wrote: > ... > The conditional is used sparingly, only for reasons of efficiency. I don't want to maintain different versions of Forth libraries or programs just because of integrated stack vs separate stack. Coding for integrated stack always works but presumably you no longer have an incentive?
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: kForth-32 v 2.7.0 thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-03-20 03:15 +0000
Re: kForth-32 v 2.7.0 Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2026-03-20 06:50 -0500
Re: kForth-32 v 2.7.0 Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2026-03-20 09:19 -0500
Re: kForth-32 v 2.7.0 dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 13:22 +1100
Re: kForth-32 v 2.7.0 Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2026-03-20 22:34 -0500
Re: kForth-32 v 2.7.0 albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-03-21 09:22 +0100
csiph-web