Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #9063
| From | stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Ideas for a portable Forth |
| Message-ID | <4f19336b.63367153@192.168.0.50> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <jf6om9$uq5$1@speranza.aioe.org> <261b0427-52d2-43bf-9ad2-9f64b2f23031@s18g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <jf8mao$us3$1@speranza.aioe.org> <9af39726-2641-4674-98e3-f05bff830204@m4g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <jfa5rh$j9q$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| Date | 2012-01-20 09:37 +0000 |
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:33:44 -0500, "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> wrote: > >> 32bit Windows, Linux, BSD and so on don't use >> segment registers in userland; [...] > >Ok, a very polite "wtf" are you talking about?!? Read that as the O/S has set them up for you and you don't need to read/write them at all. I believe that Alex knows the x86 instruction set quite well. When you get round to writing your own code generator, you will find that measurement is your friend. You will need several x86 CPU implementations of the same generation to choose optimal opcode sequences. Stephen -- Stephen Pelc, stephenXXX@mpeforth.com MicroProcessor Engineering Ltd - More Real, Less Time 133 Hill Lane, Southampton SO15 5AF, England tel: +44 (0)23 8063 1441, fax: +44 (0)23 8033 9691 web: http://www.mpeforth.com - free VFX Forth downloads
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Ideas for a portable Forth Brad <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2012-01-16 07:26 -0800
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth Tarkin <tarkin000@gmail.com> - 2012-01-16 10:32 -0800
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth Brad <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2012-01-17 06:44 -0800
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-01-18 09:34 -0500
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth Mat <dambere@web.de> - 2012-01-18 12:09 -0800
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-01-18 14:57 -0800
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-01-19 03:06 -0500
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-01-19 03:14 -0800
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-01-19 17:33 -0500
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-01-20 09:37 +0000
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-01-20 03:02 -0800
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-01-20 04:25 -0800
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth Mat <dambere@web.de> - 2012-01-21 07:42 -0800
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-01-21 15:48 -0500
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-01-21 15:01 -0800
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-01-21 21:14 -0500
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-01-16 22:42 +0000
Re: Ideas for a portable Forth "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-01-17 07:43 -0500
csiph-web