Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #11780
| From | mhx@iae.nl |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth |
| Date | 2012-04-30 07:25 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <23588120.127.1335795911306.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbfg3> (permalink) |
| References | <c81633a8-c351-4497-853d-62cb7d0c9f77@f17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <23741374.234.1335716291651.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbez18> <10309024.425.1335725354962.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbmi19> <73d31370-2292-4a41-b1c3-70563ddf8660@e42g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <27338109.184.1335768456249.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbqq1> |
On Monday, April 30, 2012 8:47:36 AM UTC+2, m...@iae.nl wrote:
[..]
Please remove the lines
z#x 0+0i Z#= IF -0.5+0i EXIT ENDIF
z#x Z#REAL F#1.0 F#<= IF NaN+NaNi EXIT ENDIF
from ZZETA (and ZETA) -- they are unnecessary. The continuation
works everywhere but the accuracy decreases outside of the
recommended domain. I have now implemented P.Borwein's Algorithm 3,
but it is very much slower as it needs a few hundred terms for 60
significant digits.
ZZETA matches Mathematica for the negative real axis and some
selected poles with Re(s) < 1.
-marcel
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Riemann zeta function in Forth Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2012-04-28 07:48 -0700
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth mhx@iae.nl - 2012-04-29 09:18 -0700
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth mhx@iae.nl - 2012-04-29 11:49 -0700
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2012-04-29 17:08 -0700
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth mhx@iae.nl - 2012-04-29 23:47 -0700
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2012-04-30 04:17 -0700
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth mhx@iae.nl - 2012-04-30 07:25 -0700
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-04-30 16:59 +0200
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth mhx@iae.nl - 2012-04-30 09:33 -0700
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2012-04-30 15:21 -0700
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-05-01 02:53 -0500
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-05-01 08:37 -1000
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2012-05-02 07:06 -0700
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 17:43 +0200
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2012-05-03 19:33 -0700
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2012-05-04 01:39 -0700
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2012-05-04 15:26 -0700
Re: Riemann zeta function in Forth The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2012-05-05 02:55 -0700
csiph-web