Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #24741
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: counted loops |
| Date | 2013-07-23 17:33 +0000 |
| Organization | Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien |
| Message-ID | <2013Jul23.193330@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <51ed8579$0$26873$e4fe514c@dreader37.news.xs4all.nl> <ksk3kk$ji2$1@dont-email.me> <3e-dneCnz7WpPnDMnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@supernews.com> <2013Jul23.144213@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <joSdndjkE9eqIXPMnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@supernews.com> |
"Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> writes:
>On 7/23/13 2:42 AM, Anton Ertl wrote:
>> Sure, writing a test may be quicker than consulting a book
>> (but that is more a comment on the quality of the books), but the user
>> first has to be aware that -5 +LOOP is behaving unintuitively.
>
>In most cases, +LOOP will do exactly what you expect. The situations in
>which you might be surprised are fairly specific and don't crop up that
>often. If you encounter one you can explore quickly.
Even in Forth, debugging a funny condition in a complex program can
take a long time. And problems don't crop up that often lead to bugs
that hide themselves well and show only up when the program has become
more complex.
>If I'm sitting at my computer I can type in:
>
>: test ( h l -- ) ?DO I . -5 +LOOP ;
>
>...in about 5 seconds.
You are a fast typist. But with that code you have only tested that
?DO...+LOOP compiles. Compiling is not the problematic case.
>To reach for a book, open it, find the right page
>and read it will take a minute or more. Even if the book's a pdf, I have
>to find it on my computer, launch Acrobat, find the right section, etc.
Ok, so you made a comment on the lack of performance of Acrobat. I
just looked for +loop in the Gforth manual (in info format, using
Emacs as info reader), and found the following passage in 25s:
| * The behaviour of `n +LOOP' is peculiar when n is negative:
|
| -1 0 ?DO i . -1 +LOOP
|
| prints `0 -1'
|
| 0 0 ?DO i . -1 +LOOP
| prints nothing.
|
| Therefore we recommend avoiding `n +LOOP' with negative n.
- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
EuroForth 2013: http://www.euroforth.org/ef13/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Happy pi approximation day Luca Saiu <positron@gnu.org> - 2013-07-21 22:45 +0200
Re: Happy pi approximation day Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-07-22 01:24 +0200
Re: Happy pi approximation day Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-07-22 01:27 +0200
Re: Happy pi approximation day Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-22 01:14 -0700
Re: Happy pi approximation day Luca Saiu <positron@gnu.org> - 2013-07-22 11:53 +0200
Re: Happy pi approximation day anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-22 15:46 +0000
Re: Happy pi approximation day albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-22 19:18 +0000
Re: Happy pi approximation day Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-07-22 21:17 +0100
Re: Happy pi approximation day "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-22 11:25 -1000
counted loops (was: Happy pi approximation day) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-23 12:42 +0000
Re: counted loops "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-23 07:24 -1000
Re: counted loops anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-23 17:33 +0000
Re: counted loops "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-23 08:06 -1000
Re: counted loops albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-23 19:47 +0000
Re: counted loops "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-23 10:02 -1000
Re: counted loops Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-23 14:58 -0500
Re: counted loops "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-23 10:14 -1000
Re: counted loops anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-24 08:13 +0000
Re: counted loops Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-23 22:42 -1000
Re: counted loops stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-07-24 09:55 +0000
Re: counted loops stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-07-24 09:37 +0000
Re: Happy pi approximation day albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-23 01:30 +0000
Re: Happy pi approximation day "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-22 19:08 -1000
Re: Happy pi approximation day m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-07-23 00:19 -0700
Re: Happy pi approximation day anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-23 13:07 +0000
Re: Happy pi approximation day albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-23 17:37 +0000
Re: Happy pi approximation day anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-23 12:31 +0000
Re: Happy pi approximation day Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-07-23 19:39 +0100
Re: Happy pi approximation day anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-24 08:16 +0000
Re: Happy pi approximation day Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-24 04:23 -0700
Re: Happy pi approximation day albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-24 11:59 +0000
Re: Happy pi approximation day Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-24 21:32 +0200
Re: Happy pi approximation day albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-24 20:07 +0000
Re: Happy pi approximation day Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-24 23:20 +0200
Re: Happy pi approximation day m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-07-22 01:30 -0700
Re: Happy pi approximation day Luca Saiu <positron@gnu.org> - 2013-07-22 11:55 +0200
Re: Happy pi approximation day albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-22 11:24 +0000
Re: Happy pi approximation day Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2013-07-22 10:48 -0500
Re: Happy pi approximation day Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-22 14:44 -0500
Re: Happy pi approximation day Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-24 00:43 -0700
Re: Happy pi approximation day Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-24 03:07 -0500
csiph-web