Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #15390

Re: continue equivalent in Forth?

From anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: continue equivalent in Forth?
Date 2012-09-02 13:15 +0000
Organization Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID <2012Sep2.151548@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
References <2012Aug31.111420@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <16711404958435@frunobulax.edu>

Show all headers | View raw

mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) writes:
>anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes Re: continue equivalent in Forth?
>
>> mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) writes:
>[..]
>> My question about SECURE was actually meant as follows: If SECURE is
>> on, iForth apparently does not accept some Forth-94-compliant control
>> structures.  What does it offer that is worth that cost?
>
>For that cost, you can compile code that other Forths won't.

Like what?  It seems to me that iForth with the default SECURE ON
cannot compile some standard code that other Forths can compile.

>Of course, it would be better to have gForth-like diagnostics with a
>SECURE flag to disable them for exceptional cases.

So what you mean is maybe this: SECURE OFF offers additional features
(without needing funny stuff like you would have to do in Gforth);
SECURE ON offers diagnostics, but is a little overzealous and might be
fixed in the far future.  Correct?

>> BTW, your posting would have been easier to read if your newsreader
>> also put quote characters in front of cited empty lines.
>
>You actually notice uncited empted lines between all the 
>quoted-printable crap that has become the standard lately?

Yes.  And given that you have the option of fixing your newsreader
rather than just switching to a different one, I chose to make you
aware of that.  Concerning the crap, if something is too hard to read,
I don't.

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2012: http://www.euroforth.org/ef12/

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

continue equivalent in Forth? programmingkidx@gmail.com - 2012-08-18 19:28 -0700
  Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-08-19 01:43 -0500
  Re: continue equivalent in Forth? mhx@iae.nl - 2012-08-19 03:40 -0700
  Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-08-19 21:07 +1000
    Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-08-19 13:55 +0200
      Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-08-20 22:13 +1000
    Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-08-19 14:18 +0200
      Re: continue equivalent in Forth? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-08-19 14:57 +0200
        Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-08-19 16:39 +0200
      Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-08-20 22:18 +1000
      Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-21 00:05 -0400
        Re: continue equivalent in Forth? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2012-08-20 21:17 -0700
          Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-08-21 02:40 -0700
          Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-08-22 15:33 +1000
        Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-08-21 02:37 -0700
          Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-22 00:53 -0400
            Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-08-22 04:10 -0700
        Re: continue equivalent in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-08-21 11:40 +0000
          Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-22 00:53 -0400
            Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-08-21 21:18 -1000
              Re: continue equivalent in Forth? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2012-08-22 00:52 -0700
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-08-22 04:12 -0700
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-22 07:43 -0400
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2012-08-22 20:04 -0700
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-08-25 15:50 +1000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-08-24 21:03 -1000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-08-26 22:13 +1000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-08-25 10:40 +0200
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-08-29 18:29 +1000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-08-29 21:26 +0200
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-08-26 22:33 +1000
              Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-22 07:46 -0400
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-08-22 07:20 -1000
            Re: continue equivalent in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-08-22 09:37 +0000
              Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-08-22 20:46 +1000
              Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-22 07:44 -0400
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-08-22 14:26 +0000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2012-08-24 17:34 +0100
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-08-24 16:50 +0000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-24 13:47 -0700
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? mhx@iae.nl - 2012-08-24 22:51 -0700
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-08-25 08:55 +0000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2012-08-25 20:47 -0700
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-26 06:20 -0400
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-08-26 11:04 -0500
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-08-26 16:06 +0000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-08-26 15:32 -0500
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-27 22:58 -0700
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2012-08-26 22:07 +0100
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-08-27 18:14 +0200
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2012-08-27 18:22 +0100
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-08-27 20:45 +0200
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2012-08-27 21:43 +0100
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-08-27 12:15 -1000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-08-28 20:43 +0200
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-08-29 17:10 +1000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-08-28 15:56 +0000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-08-28 20:35 +0200
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-08-30 12:32 +0000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-08-30 22:39 +0200
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-08-31 09:14 +0000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-08-31 21:32 +0200
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-09-02 20:30 +1000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-09-02 13:15 +0000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-08-31 18:27 +1000
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-08-31 20:39 +0200
                Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-09-01 14:28 +1000
          Re: continue equivalent in Forth? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2012-08-21 22:59 -0700
        Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-08-21 20:49 +0200
          Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-22 07:46 -0400
            Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-08-22 16:24 +0200
    Re: continue equivalent in Forth? programmingkidx@gmail.com - 2012-08-19 14:37 -0700
      Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-08-20 05:17 -0500
      Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-08-20 22:34 +1000
      Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-08-20 23:01 +1000
      Re: continue equivalent in Forth? stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-08-21 08:34 +0000
        Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2012-08-21 15:53 +0100
  Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-19 11:00 -0400
    Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-08-19 20:29 +0200
      Re: continue equivalent in Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-21 00:04 -0400
    Re: continue equivalent in Forth? programmingkidx@gmail.com - 2012-08-19 14:09 -0700
  Re: continue equivalent in Forth? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-19 11:31 -0700
    Re: continue equivalent in Forth? programmingkidx@gmail.com - 2012-08-19 14:43 -0700

csiph-web