Re: Status of OO in Forth?

From	anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Status of OO in Forth?
Date	2012-04-24 16:47 +0000
Organization	Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID	<2012Apr24.184732@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
References	<4f803281$0$6568$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <2012Apr8.182913@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <5ba20241-6aad-4fd8-a14c-3242bafaf475@f27g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <4f96a2c4$0$286$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <ef2dnZfYKoSAIwvSnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@supernews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Actually, it's pretty easy to write an objects extension that uses no 
>> vocabularies (wordlists) at all, anywhere, if you think using 
>> vocabularies is 'hacky'.  It's straightforward if you are willing to 
>> accept a message-object ordering.
>
>Why does it require a message-object ordering?

It doesn't (but then he did not say that it does, did he?).  As an
example, mini-OOF uses object-method and does not use vocabularies
<http://bernd-paysan.de/mini-oof.html>.

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2011: http://www.euroforth.org/ef11/

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Status of OO in Forth? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-04-24 08:55 -0400
  Re: Status of OO in Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-04-24 09:52 -0500
    Re: Status of OO in Forth? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-04-24 10:58 -0400
      Re: Status of OO in Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-04-24 11:43 -0500
        Re: Status of OO in Forth? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-04-25 08:41 -0400
          Re: Status of OO in Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-04-25 07:52 -0500
            Re: Status of OO in Forth? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-04-25 09:47 -0400
              Re: Status of OO in Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-04-25 10:37 -0500
                Re: Status of OO in Forth? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-04-25 12:18 -0400
                Re: Status of OO in Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-04-25 11:39 -0500
          Re: Status of OO in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-25 15:16 +0000
            Re: Status of OO in Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-04-25 08:33 -0700
            Re: Status of OO in Forth? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-04-25 11:52 -0400
              Re: Status of OO in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-26 16:26 +0000
                Re: Status of OO in Forth? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-26 13:09 -0700
                Re: Status of OO in Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-04-26 14:20 -1000
                Re: Status of OO in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-27 09:21 +0000
                Re: Status of OO in Forth? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-04-26 21:42 -0400
    Re: Status of OO in Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-24 16:47 +0000
      Re: Status of OO in Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-04-24 12:02 -0500

csiph-web