Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #7656
| From | mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: What would you call this threading method? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Message-ID | <18861205928436@frunobulax.edu> (permalink) |
| Date | 2011-11-30 23:49 +0200 |
| References | <541f26b7-e884-4890-9e10-60889a8d1815@q16g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
Charles Childers <crc@rx-core.org> writes Re: What would you call this threading method? > On Nov 26, 11:49=A0am, m...@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) wrote: >> "jacer...@gmail.com" <jacer...@gmail.com> writes Re: What would you call this threading method? >> [..]> Since the interpreter is contained in a single routine, the compiler >> > can make a good job at allocating registers. The speed difference is >> > notable (bench/fib.rx with 1000 iterations instead of 100): [..] >> When compiled with cygwin (32-bit) and run under Windows 7, it works >> (I downloaded the default image file from the main site, guessing that >> would be somehow necessary). However, I always get a segfault when >> I do bye? >> -marcel > At the end of the main function, switch the positions of the calls to > rxDel and rxRestoreIO. This will fix the bug. OK. Now I have your attention ... Somewhat to my surprise I found that cygwin 32bit has no problem in building a runnable 64-bit ngaro interpreter! Of course, in this case the host is still 32-bits. Is this the intended behavior? (the mingw 64bit tools that I have can only build windows targets and do not seem to understand the assembler syntax in ngaro.c). I found that in past few days it has become quite a lot more difficult to find convert.c and source files for ngaro. -marcel
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What would you call this threading method? "jacereda@gmail.com" <jacereda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-24 14:29 -0800
Re: What would you call this threading method? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2011-11-24 14:47 -0800
Re: What would you call this threading method? "jacereda@gmail.com" <jacereda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-27 12:50 -0800
Re: What would you call this threading method? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-11-27 17:47 -0500
Re: What would you call this threading method? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2011-11-27 15:27 -0800
Re: What would you call this threading method? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2011-11-26 18:49 +0200
Re: What would you call this threading method? "jacereda@gmail.com" <jacereda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-27 12:46 -0800
Re: What would you call this threading method? Charles Childers <crc@rx-core.org> - 2011-11-29 17:05 -0800
Re: What would you call this threading method? Charles Childers <crc@rx-core.org> - 2011-11-29 17:06 -0800
Re: What would you call this threading method? Charles Childers <crc@rx-core.org> - 2011-11-29 17:05 -0800
Re: What would you call this threading method? Charles Childers <crc@rx-core.org> - 2011-11-29 17:06 -0800
Re: What would you call this threading method? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2011-11-30 23:49 +0200
Re: What would you call this threading method? crc <charles.childers@gmail.com> - 2011-12-02 06:22 -0800
Re: What would you call this threading method? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2011-12-03 11:52 +0200
Re: What would you call this threading method? crc <charles.childers@gmail.com> - 2011-12-07 10:51 -0800
Re: What would you call this threading method? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2011-11-28 00:35 +0200
Re: What would you call this threading method? "jacereda@gmail.com" <jacereda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-27 16:33 -0800
Re: What would you call this threading method? Mat <dambere@web.de> - 2011-12-05 09:19 -0800
csiph-web