Re: DSPic FORTH

X-Received	by 10.224.178.204 with SMTP id bn12mr10989389qab.1.1357762315780; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 12:11:55 -0800 (PST)
Received	by 10.49.1.43 with SMTP id 11mr12682614qej.29.1357762315720; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 12:11:55 -0800 (PST)
Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.216.87.MISMATCH!t8no2254613qaj.0!news-out.google.com!k2ni5538qap.0!nntp.google.com!p13no2275492qai.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Date	Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:11:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To	<ea322526-0998-4fdc-9275-392258ffcd99@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.248.146.66; posting-account=_hEtMgoAAABhQKsGfAH7jxBisHnbd-Kg
NNTP-Posting-Host	12.248.146.66
References	<374fbdf6-1fdb-4e85-a029-250174e38548@googlegroups.com> <ea322526-0998-4fdc-9275-392258ffcd99@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent	G2/1.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Message-ID	<166b97d9-2f51-40d2-a0a3-e602255f1a07@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: DSPic FORTH
From	donseglio@gmail.com
Injection-Date	Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:11:55 +0000
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.forth:18602

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 1:53:41 PM UTC-6, Brad Eckert wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 10:51:54 AM UTC-7, dons...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > Is there anything else available? Is there a reason for this that anyone is aware? 
> 
> > 
> 
> I think the vendors chose to concentrate on the most popular family in the 16-bit niche, the MSP430. These day's you're not going to see a new port unless someone pays for it or does it themselves.

The MSP430 family has a beautiful instruction set and architecture, you can implement a very efficient FORTH for it, but unfortunately it won't fit the crunching capacity I'm looking for. I have not looked at them in a while so maybe new models are more powerful.

Cecil - k5nwa

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

DSPic FORTH donseglio@gmail.com - 2013-01-09 09:51 -0800
  Re: DSPic FORTH Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 11:53 -0800
    Re: DSPic FORTH donseglio@gmail.com - 2013-01-09 12:11 -0800
      Re: DSPic FORTH Mikael Nordman <oh2aun@invalid.com> - 2013-01-09 22:46 +0200
        Re: DSPic FORTH Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2013-01-24 15:57 +0100
  Re: DSPic FORTH stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-01-09 20:22 +0000
    Re: DSPic FORTH Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-01-10 09:39 -0800
  Re: DSPic FORTH Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-01-09 14:09 -0800
    Re: DSPic FORTH donseglio@gmail.com - 2013-01-09 14:53 -0800
      Re: DSPic FORTH Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-01-09 18:54 -0800
        Re: DSPic FORTH donseglio@gmail.com - 2013-01-09 20:48 -0800
          Re: DSPic FORTH rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-01-10 17:35 -0500
            Re: DSPic FORTH donseglio@gmail.com - 2013-01-10 16:53 -0800
              Re: DSPic FORTH rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-01-13 17:22 -0500
          Re: DSPic FORTH Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-01-10 20:59 -0800
            Re: DSPic FORTH rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-01-13 17:25 -0500
              Re: DSPic FORTH Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-01-14 13:45 -0800
                Re: DSPic FORTH rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-01-14 17:09 -0500
                Re: DSPic FORTH Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-01-14 15:27 -0800
                Re: DSPic FORTH rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-01-15 00:20 -0500
                Re: DSPic FORTH Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-01-17 07:39 -0800

csiph-web