Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #133655

Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".

From dxf <dxforth@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".
Date 2025-06-09 23:55 +1000
Organization i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID <01f7a894eb384b595096fd1b2970a92d399f297b@i2pn2.org> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <de084ed29e5acc412c06ed739c24929f22313288@i2pn2.org> <2ce249aa06ffa026b7ea087ed20c6d0612301dc6@i2pn2.org> <2dbb987eed74bd6038996cb31f72b231@www.novabbs.com> <8fe16d3c9ab0a216a52d7209911535984575e9e7@i2pn2.org> <e0fe3f86806602fb05a8bc83c7c0a813@www.novabbs.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/06/2025 10:14 pm, LIT wrote:
>> Word names are litter but hot patches and compiler-security
>> evasions are acceptable.  Each day one learns something new
>> in Forth :)
> 
> No, no "hot patches"; I did that deliberately.
> Noticed, that I need the limits only for
> DO..LOOP - and for nothing more - then
> conclusion was to use the numbers directly,
> not naming them. Both lists are, in a way,
> part of VAL word and (probably) won't be
> used again by anothing else. So there wasn't
> any need to name them.

Forth has quotations for nameless code.  What's lacking is the
same for nameless data :)

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-08 13:26 +0200
  Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-08 14:41 +0000
    Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-09 02:07 +1000
      Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-08 16:23 +0000
        Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-09 11:46 +1000
          Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-09 09:23 +0000
          Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-09 12:39 +0200
            Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-09 12:16 +0000
            Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-09 17:44 +0200
      Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-09 13:42 +1000
        Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-09 09:26 +0000
          Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-09 21:04 +1000
            Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-09 12:14 +0000
              Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-09 23:55 +1000
        Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-09 09:58 +0000
  Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-08 16:35 +0000
    Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-09 06:23 +0000
    Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-09 07:15 +0000
    Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r". albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-09 12:20 +0200

csiph-web