Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.clipper.visual-objects > #666
| From | "Stephen Quinn" <stevejqNO@bigpondSPAM.net.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.clipper.visual-objects |
| References | <75mbp6djn5fd676qblqrg3u1k18emu916c@4ax.com> <4d965b49$0$88196$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <35edp69tpvt0n7u2t24gsmioonp7q6btvs@4ax.com> <8vnvp4Fl4lU1@mid.individual.net> <h64jp6pp18fbpe6bv003pde6meqsntoqmo@4ax.com> |
| Subject | Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver |
| Message-ID | <Pvlmp.559$CS3.450@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2011-04-05 01:32 +1000 |
| Organization | BigPond |
Dick > The original code took 219 ms to perform. Just running the loop once > more too 62 ms. So I have to save 1/3 on AAdd's if I would need the > loop first > I have seen one value of 374 (also looks like a first time), once > 146 ms and once 110 ms. I don't know where the other differences come > from If you've run this in consective lines of code, you'll probably be getting the data from cache memory the second and third times and not from disk as you would the first time. Did you use Suspend/RestNotification() around the code?? CYA Steve
Back to comp.lang.clipper.visual-objects | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver D.J.W. van Kooten <public@ic2remove.this.com> - 2011-04-01 16:46 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver Mathias <mathias.hakansson@consultec.se> - 2011-04-01 08:04 -0700
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver "Geoff Schaller" <geoffx@softwarexobjectives.com.au> - 2011-04-01 23:10 +0000
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver D.J.W. van Kooten <public@ic2remove.this.com> - 2011-04-02 07:50 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver E®!k \\/!$$E® <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-04-02 08:58 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver Mathias <mathias.hakansson@consultec.se> - 2011-04-04 00:07 -0700
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver "Stephen Quinn" <stevejqNO@bigpondSPAM.net.au> - 2011-04-04 17:24 +1000
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver E®!k \\/!$$E® <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-04-04 10:07 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver Mathias <mathias.hakansson@consultec.se> - 2011-04-04 01:41 -0700
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver E®!k \\/!$$E® <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-04-06 16:52 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver Mathias <mathias.hakansson@consultec.se> - 2011-04-06 22:38 -0700
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver Robert van der Hulst <E-55525A53-4118-E@heliks.nl> - 2011-04-04 10:09 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver "Geoff Schaller" <geoffx@softwarexobjectives.com.au> - 2011-04-04 21:43 +0000
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver D.J.W. van Kooten <public@ic2remove.this.com> - 2011-04-05 09:05 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver E®!k \\/!$$E® <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-04-05 11:41 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver D.J.W. van Kooten <public@ic2remove.this.com> - 2011-04-05 20:07 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver "Geoff Schaller" <geoffx@softwarexobjectives.com.au> - 2011-04-05 21:41 +0000
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver D.J.W. van Kooten <public@ic2remove.this.com> - 2011-04-06 09:07 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver Mathias <mathias.hakansson@consultec.se> - 2011-04-06 03:07 -0700
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver D.J.W. van Kooten <public@ic2remove.this.com> - 2011-04-06 14:54 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver "Geoff Schaller" <geoffx@softwarexobjectives.com.au> - 2011-04-04 21:41 +0000
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver D.J.W. van Kooten <public@ic2remove.this.com> - 2011-04-04 11:44 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver "Stephen Quinn" <stevejqNO@bigpondSPAM.net.au> - 2011-04-05 01:32 +1000
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver D.J.W. van Kooten <public@ic2remove.this.com> - 2011-04-05 08:58 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver "Stephen Quinn" <stevejqNO@bigpondSPAM.net.au> - 2011-04-05 17:55 +1000
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver D.J.W. van Kooten <public@ic2remove.this.com> - 2011-04-05 20:11 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver "Geoff Schaller" <geoffx@softwarexobjectives.com.au> - 2011-04-05 21:43 +0000
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver D.J.W. van Kooten <public@ic2remove.this.com> - 2011-04-06 09:11 +0200
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver "Geoff Schaller" <geoffx@softwarexobjectives.com.au> - 2011-04-07 22:18 +0000
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver Mathias <mathias.hakansson@consultec.se> - 2011-04-08 00:07 -0700
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver "Willie Moore" <williem@wmconsulting.com> - 2011-04-08 08:13 -0500
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver "Geoff Schaller" <geoffx@softwarexobjectives.com.au> - 2011-04-09 09:32 +0000
Re: Replacing LV with bBrowser: much slower because of arrayserver "Geoff Schaller" <geoffx@softwarexobjectives.com.au> - 2011-04-02 22:07 +0000
csiph-web