Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #84154 > unrolled thread

C

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c

Contents

  C mervetektas1995@gmail.com - 2016-03-16 11:04 -0700
    Re: C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-03-16 18:16 +0000
      Re: C Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 19:23 +0000
        Re: C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-03-16 21:49 +0000
          Re: C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 15:22 -0700
            Re: C Randy Howard <rhoward.mx@EverybodyUsesIt.com> - 2016-03-16 20:39 -0500
              Re: C Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 22:53 -0700
              Re: C Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 06:47 +0000
                Re: C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-03-17 07:20 +0000
                  Re: C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 01:22 -0700
                    Re: C gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-03-17 08:53 +0000
                      Re: C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 02:48 -0700
                        Re: C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-17 09:26 -0700
                          What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-03-17 16:51 +0000
                            Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-17 11:05 -0700
                              Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-17 18:19 +0000
                              Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-03-17 11:22 -0700
                                Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-03-17 19:28 +0000
                                  Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 14:32 -0700
                                Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-18 02:58 -0700
                                  Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-03-18 10:32 +0000
                                    Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 07:55 -0700
                                    Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:13 -0700
                                  Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-03-18 08:58 -0700
                                    Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-03-18 16:03 +0000
                                      Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 09:49 -0700
                                    Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-18 11:16 -0700
                                      Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-03-18 18:28 +0000
                                        Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:29 -0700
                    Re: C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 02:14 -0700
                    Re: C Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-03-17 19:55 -0400
                  Re: C Randy Howard <rhoward.mx@EverybodyUsesIt.com> - 2016-03-17 23:06 -0500
                    Re: C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 02:02 -0700
                      Re: C Randy Howard <rhoward.mx@EverybodyUsesIt.com> - 2016-03-18 10:50 -0500
                        Re: C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-03-18 15:53 +0000
                          Re: C Randy Howard <rhoward.mx@EverybodyUsesIt.com> - 2016-03-18 11:14 -0500
                            Re: C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-03-18 16:20 +0000
                              Re: C Randy Howard <rhoward.mx@EverybodyUsesIt.com> - 2016-03-18 11:28 -0500
                                Re: C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-03-18 16:46 +0000
                        Re: C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 09:47 -0700
                      Re: C "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-03-18 12:20 -0600
                        Re: C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 10:35 -0700
                Re: C Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-03-17 19:51 -0400
                  Re: C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:55 -0700
            Re: C Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-03-17 19:50 -0400
    Re: C Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2016-03-16 20:02 +0100
    Re: C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-03-16 12:02 -0700
      Re: C Arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2016-03-17 12:29 +0000
        Re: C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:11 -0700
    Re: C "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-03-16 14:45 -0600
      Re: C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-16 15:58 -0700
    Re: C mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2016-03-17 09:57 -0700
      Re: C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-03-17 11:03 -0700

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#84154 — C

1.	Design an algorithm to print hello world to the screen. 
a.	Write pseudo code of your solution first. (10 pts)
b.	Write the c code for your solution. (20 pts)
2.	Design an algorithm that takes an integer value from the user and notifies the user either this number is even or odd.
a.	Write pseudo code of your solution first. (20 pts)
b.	Write the c code for your solution. (20 pts)
3.	(30pts) Write the c code of the algorithm given in the slide 18 of 03.ppt. 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#84157

On 16/03/16 18:04, mervetektas1995@gmail.com wrote:
> 1.	Design an algorithm to print hello world to the screen.
> a.	Write pseudo code of your solution first. (10 pts)
> b.	Write the c code for your solution. (20 pts)
> 2.	Design an algorithm that takes an integer value from the user and notifies the user either this number is even or odd.
> a.	Write pseudo code of your solution first. (20 pts)
> b.	Write the c code for your solution. (20 pts)
> 3.	(30pts) Write the c code of the algorithm given in the slide 18 of 03.ppt.

I claim 100 points for the following solutions:

1a. Print hello world to the screen.
1b.
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(void){system("echo hello world");return 0;}
2a. take integer value from the user
     notify user either this number is even or odd
1b.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(void){
getchar();system("echo this number is even or odd");
return 0;}
3.
$ cat "the slide 18 of 03.ppt"
Print hello world to the screen.
$ cat printhw.c
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(void){system("echo hello world");return 0;}

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84177

Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:

> 1a. Print hello world to the screen.
> 1b.
> #include <stdlib.h>
> int main(void){system("echo hello world");return 0;}

Richard Heathfield posting an answer that is non-portable,
implementation defined code??!?!?

Truly, this must have been an utterly idiotic question.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84190

On 16/03/16 19:23, Gareth Owen wrote:
> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:
>
>> 1a. Print hello world to the screen.
>> 1b.
>> #include <stdlib.h>
>> int main(void){system("echo hello world");return 0;}
>
> Richard Heathfield posting an answer that is non-portable,
> implementation defined code??!?!?

You think that's bad? I nearly did this:

int main(void)
{
   unsigned char *p = (unsigned char *)0xb8000000UL;
   const char *s = "hello world";
   while(*s)
   {
     *p++ = *s++;
     *p++ = 0x46;
   }
   return 0;
}

and it's actually a better answer, because it really does write to the 
screen, even if you try to redirect it.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84193

Richard Heathfield wrote:
> and it's actually a better answer, because it really does write
> to the screen, even if you try to redirect it.

No it doesn't.  It will fail in all cases except real-mode code running
under strict BIOS defaults, or V86 mode running similarly.

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84208

On 3/16/16 5:22 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> and it's actually a better answer, because it really does write
>> to the screen, even if you try to redirect it.
>
> No it doesn't.  It will fail in all cases except real-mode code running
> under strict BIOS defaults, or V86 mode running similarly.
>
> Best regards,
> Rick C. Hodgin
>

With a few specific types of video card only.

-- 
Randy Howard
(replace the obvious text in the obvious way if you wish to contact me 
directly)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84212

Oh wow.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84213

Randy Howard <rhoward.mx@EverybodyUsesIt.com> writes:

> On 3/16/16 5:22 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>> Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>> and it's actually a better answer, because it really does write
>>> to the screen, even if you try to redirect it.
>>
>> No it doesn't.  It will fail in all cases except real-mode code running
>> under strict BIOS defaults, or V86 mode running similarly.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>
>
> With a few specific types of video card only.

Of course, if you want to do it in a more portable manner, call INT 10h

#oldschool #itspossiblerichardwasntbeingentirelyserious

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84214

On 17/03/16 06:47, Gareth Owen wrote:
> Randy Howard <rhoward.mx@EverybodyUsesIt.com> writes:
>
>> On 3/16/16 5:22 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>> Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>> and it's actually a better answer, because it really does write
>>>> to the screen, even if you try to redirect it.
>>>
>>> No it doesn't.  It will fail in all cases except real-mode code running
>>> under strict BIOS defaults, or V86 mode running similarly.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>>
>>
>> With a few specific types of video card only.
>
> Of course, if you want to do it in a more portable manner, call INT 10h
>
> #oldschool #itspossiblerichardwasntbeingentirelyserious

In Randy's defence, I think it's entirely possible that his reply was a 
somewhat ironic follow-up to the original objection, a sort of sarcastic 
version of "whoosh". Randy is not a stupid man.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84216

Richard Heathfield wrote:
> In Randy's defence, I think it's entirely possible that his reply was
> a somewhat ironic follow-up to the original objection, a sort of
> sarcastic version of "whoosh". Randy is not a stupid man.

The original poster's post is obviously a homework assignment,
but that does not give you the right to pick up a stick and start
beating them over the head by poking fun at them.

It was rude, mean, and you owe that person an apology.

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84219

In article <8b9fe638-55aa-4ddf-8e69-3ea9feffc054@googlegroups.com>,
Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:
>Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> In Randy's defence, I think it's entirely possible that his reply was
>> a somewhat ironic follow-up to the original objection, a sort of
>> sarcastic version of "whoosh". Randy is not a stupid man.
>
>The original poster's post is obviously a homework assignment,
>but that does not give you the right to pick up a stick and start
>beating them over the head by poking fun at them.
>
>It was rude, mean, and you owe that person an apology.

This is rich, coming from you.

Given that you're the biggest stick-swinger in this group.

-- 
Just for a change of pace, this sig is *not* an obscure reference to
comp.lang.c...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84221

Kenny McCormack wrote:
> This is rich, coming from you.
>
> Given that you're the biggest stick-swinger in this group.

You say that only because you will not accept the free gift of
salvation offeres by Jesus Christ.  You refuse to acknowledge
that you are a sinner in need of forgiveness.  You are content
to stand boldly before the face of God and scream at the
top of your lungs, "I DON'T NEED YOU!  GO AWAY!  LET ME
LIVE **MY** LIFE!!!"

You refuse to acknowledge that He gave you life.
You refuse to acknowledge that He made this universe you live in.
You refuse to acknowledge that He loves you, and is extending
to you a free "Get Out Of Hell" card, choosing instead to get
a good running start and dive headlong into the fiery flames of
torment from which you will never return.

You refuse to see the truth, so you are wholly content to believe
the lie, and it will cost you everything forever.  Your voice will
never be heard again.  Your name will never be remembered.  The
path you've chosen will not serve you well, and you will writhe in
utter torment forever ... unless you repent.

You are at that place, Kenny.  So of course you will call up down,
and right wrong, and wrong right, and proper guidance improper
guidance.  You won't see the truth so you spew forth from your
own condemnation vile, blackness of the foulest odor and appearance.

So many people do not realize the state they're in.  There is no
hope on the course you've set.  There is no bright future just
up ahead.  There is no future at all.  You are dead men walking,
and you will perish eternally unless you repent.  You will be utterly
and completely cast down forever and ever.

It's time to wake up to reality.  The signs of His return are everywhere.
There isn't much time, and when the final trumpet sounds, that's
it.

Don't let it end that way.  Take heed of His warning.  Receive from
Him the free gift of forgiveness, and Life.

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84260

On Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 9:48:39 AM UTC, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> Kenny McCormack wrote:
> > This is rich, coming from you.
> >
> > Given that you're the biggest stick-swinger in this group.
> 
> You say that only because you will not accept the free gift of
> salvation offeres by Jesus Christ.  You refuse to acknowledge
> that you are a sinner in need of forgiveness.  
>
I strongly suspect Kenny is a Catholic atheist.
It's rare for Catholic atheists to deny the doctrine of human
sinfulness.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84261 — What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C)

In article <1cadc787-9199-462d-be5a-ff60cd22f1d9@googlegroups.com>,
Malcolm McLean  <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> wrote:
...
>I strongly suspect Kenny is a Catholic atheist.

Why do you say that?

>It's rare for Catholic atheists to deny the doctrine of human
>sinfulness.

Why do you say that?

-- 
"Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS
crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in
TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in
bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84273 — Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C)

On Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 4:51:49 PM UTC, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> In article <1cadc787-9199-462d-be5a-ff60cd22f1d9@googlegroups.com>,
> Malcolm McLean  <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> wrote:
> ...
> >I strongly suspect Kenny is a Catholic atheist.
> 
> Why do you say that?
> 
Celtic name, like mine, and general attitude.
>
> >It's rare for Catholic atheists to deny the doctrine of human
> >sinfulness.
> 
> Why do you say that?
> 
The Protestants rejected the sacrament of confession, whilst still paying
lip service to the doctrine of human sinfulness. So Protestant atheists
tend to take that to its logical conclusion, developing theories like 
Marxism which were based on the principle of human perfectibility.
Catholic atheists tend not to do that.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84277 — Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C)

On 17/03/2016 18:05, Malcolm McLean wrote:
> On Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 4:51:49 PM UTC, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>> In article <1cadc787-9199-462d-be5a-ff60cd22f1d9@googlegroups.com>,
>> Malcolm McLean  <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> wrote:
>> ...
>>> I strongly suspect Kenny is a Catholic atheist.
>>
>> Why do you say that?
>>
> Celtic name, like mine, and general attitude.

I've always thought 'Kenny McCormack' was named after a character from 
South Park. But I now see the spelling is a little different.

>>
>>> It's rare for Catholic atheists to deny the doctrine of human
>>> sinfulness.
>>
>> Why do you say that?
>>
> The Protestants rejected the sacrament of confession, whilst still paying
> lip service to the doctrine of human sinfulness. So Protestant atheists
> tend to take that to its logical conclusion, developing theories like
> Marxism which were based on the principle of human perfectibility.
> Catholic atheists tend not to do that.

I'm a Catholic, and an atheist (I guess), and I haven't a clue what 
that's all about. (I couldn't even tell you the difference between 
Catholics and Protestants. And please don't enlighten me; this is the 
wrong group, and I really don't care!)

-- 
Bartc

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84278 — Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C)

Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> writes:
[...]
>> In article <1cadc787-9199-462d-be5a-ff60cd22f1d9@googlegroups.com>,
>> Malcolm McLean  <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> wrote:
>> ...
>> > ... Catholic atheist. ...
>> 
[...]
>> 
> Celtic name, like mine, and general attitude.
>>
>> >It's rare for Catholic atheists to deny the doctrine of human
>> >sinfulness.
>> 
[...]
>> 
> The Protestants rejected the sacrament of confession, whilst still paying
[...]

Malcolm, *please*, just stop it.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84281 — Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C)

In article <ln7fh1ezge.fsf@kst-u.example.com>,
Keith "Kiki" Thompson  <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
>Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> writes:
>[...]
>>> In article <1cadc787-9199-462d-be5a-ff60cd22f1d9@googlegroups.com>,
>>> Malcolm McLean  <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> > ... Catholic atheist. ...
>>> 
>[...]
>>> 
>> Celtic name, like mine, and general attitude.
>>>
>>> >It's rare for Catholic atheists to deny the doctrine of human
>>> >sinfulness.
>>> 
>[...]
>>> 
>> The Protestants rejected the sacrament of confession, whilst still paying
>[...]
>
>Malcolm, *please*, just stop it.

Wouldn't it be a lot easier on you and on everybody else if you just put
Malcolm in your killfile, as you have so graciously done for me oh those
many years ago?

Quite seriously, isn't that the spirit of Usenet - that each man is
responsible for his own killfile but should not concern himself with what
others are allowed to see?

-- 
"Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS
crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in
TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in
bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84285 — Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C)

W dniu czwartek, 17 marca 2016 20:28:16 UTC+1 użytkownik Kenny McCormack napisał:
> In article <ln7fh1ezge.fsf@kst-u.example.com>,
> Keith "Kiki" Thompson  <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
> >Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> writes:
> >[...]
> >>> In article <1cadc787-9199-462d-be5a-ff60cd22f1d9@googlegroups.com>,
> >>> Malcolm McLean  <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>> > ... Catholic atheist. ...
> >>> 
> >[...]
> >>> 
> >> Celtic name, like mine, and general attitude.
> >>>
> >>> >It's rare for Catholic atheists to deny the doctrine of human
> >>> >sinfulness.
> >>> 
> >[...]
> >>> 
> >> The Protestants rejected the sacrament of confession, whilst still paying
> >[...]
> >
> >Malcolm, *please*, just stop it.
> 
> Wouldn't it be a lot easier on you and on everybody else if you just put
> Malcolm in your killfile, as you have so graciously done for me oh those
> many years ago?
> 
> Quite seriously, isn't that the spirit of Usenet - that each man is
> responsible for his own killfile but should not concern himself with what
> others are allowed to see?
> 
> -- 
> "Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS
> crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in
> TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in
> bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither."

keith is self imaginable boss who is allowed by himself to 
insult you and me, killfile us in public, agitate we are 
trolls and do other weirdos - you will not change him he 
is just Troll Insulter driven by some BASIC.. 
everybody is happy with that , he arranges primitive sutuations 
based by his own insults, but anyway it is stupid but standable 
- what can you do (we could contra-agitate in defence ;)
 This could at least let me feel like men from the Sherwood woods ;o
im atacked by imaginable nothingham sheriff, we'are (the keith imaginabvble) outlaws xd - and it even seems we must accept this dream-roles to get into his mind (as he enforces it) - inception you seen this movie

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84312 — Re: What's a "Catholic atheist"? (Was: C)

On Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 6:23:03 PM UTC, Keith Thompson wrote:
> Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> writes:
> [...]
> >> In article <1cadc787-9199-462d-be5a-ff60cd22f1d9@googlegroups.com>,
> >> Malcolm McLean  <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> wrote:
> >> ...
> >> > ... Catholic atheist. ...
> >> 
> [...]
> >> 
> > Celtic name, like mine, and general attitude.
> >>
> >> >It's rare for Catholic atheists to deny the doctrine of human
> >> >sinfulness.
> >> 
> [...]
> >> 
> > The Protestants rejected the sacrament of confession, whilst still paying
> [...]
> 
> Malcolm, *please*, just stop it.
> 
Sorry.
Sometimes with Kenny I just can't help it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c

csiph-web