Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #381657 > unrolled thread

Please take unrelated content elsewhere

Started byTim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
First post2024-02-02 22:27 -0800
Last post2024-02-03 12:19 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c


Contents

  Please take unrelated content elsewhere Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-02-02 22:27 -0800
    Re: Please take unrelated content elsewhere David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-02-03 12:19 +0100

#381657 — Please take unrelated content elsewhere

FromTim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Date2024-02-02 22:27 -0800
SubjectPlease take unrelated content elsewhere
Message-ID<867cjm9i5c.fsf@linuxsc.com>
I connected to comp.lang.c earlier today, with about 36 hours
since my previous connection.

Not including my own recent postings, I found 195 new messages.
Of these new messages, there were, give or take, just 17 messages
that discussed C programs or the C programming language.  That's
a little bit under 9%.

Here is a summary of those articles' authors and the number of
messages for each author.

     29  Lawrence D'Oliveiro
     28  David Brown
     25  bart
     24  Janis Papanagnou
     22  Scott Lurndal
     18  Malcolm McLean
     15  Keith Thompson
     10  Kaz Kylheku
      7  Michael S
      5  Chris M. Thomasson
      3  Richard Harnden
      3  Ben Bacarisse
      2  tTh
      1  Kenny McCormack
      1  Gary R. Schmidt
      1  Dan Cross
      1  Anthony Cuozzo

Please take unrelated content elsewhere.  Thank you.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#381666

FromDavid Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Date2024-02-03 12:19 +0100
Message-ID<upl7g6$33joc$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#381657
On 03/02/2024 07:27, Tim Rentsch wrote:
> I connected to comp.lang.c earlier today, with about 36 hours
> since my previous connection.
> 
> Not including my own recent postings, I found 195 new messages.

And of your own postings, how many of them were related to C, rather 
than desperately trying to justify why you won't answer simple questions 
and would rather try to define the word "answer" ?

When lots of people here are in discussion threads, then the threads are 
clearly of interest to lots of people here.  It might not be on-topic, 
and it might be worth making that clear if people are unsure, but it is 
obviously not a big problem for the group.

If you want to start a topical thread on C, go for it.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c


csiph-web