Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #389514
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: best approach for multithreading (?) |
| Date | Sat, 7 Dec 2024 20:36:24 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 38 |
| Message-ID | <vj37o7$3eaf4$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <ddd3a0b59c95b5752b66f46348c96a6f8279d518@i2pn2.org> <slrnvkousf.2d4d7.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <vii0ao$2jdsb$1@dont-email.me> <20241201074928.161@kylheku.com> <viipr8$2qq41$4@dont-email.me> <20241203094647.518@kylheku.com> <vitfc3$1so4u$1@dont-email.me> <20241205191339.256@kylheku.com> <3mF4P.64$pAh5.41@fx06.iad> <vj0ln4$2se98$1@dont-email.me> <20241207044414.446@kylheku.com> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Sun, 08 Dec 2024 05:36:24 +0100 (CET) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="021479c43f8aee38ea8f1e7f736414c6"; logging-data="3615204"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/S4pm1HIgi+Y7XzaaHpRdCLifF6V2A9Gk=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla Thunderbird |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:LbK7xI1v3syslyiXSYi3c8sOSFY= |
| In-Reply-To | <20241207044414.446@kylheku.com> |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:389514 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 12/7/2024 7:49 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote: > On 2024-12-07, James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote: >> On 12/6/24 11:10, Scott Lurndal wrote: >>> Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes: >>>> On 2024-12-06, James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote: >> ... >>>>> C <threads.h> can be implemented as a thin wrapper over POSIX threads. >>>>> The waste is relatively negligible. The differences, were intended to >>>>> allow <threads.h> to also be implemented on non-POSIX systems as >>>>> wrappers for whatever the native threading system was. >>>> >>>> Generally speaking, you can have a function called pthread_create on >>>> non-POSIX systems, and a header <pthread.h>. >>> >>> There are certain requirements of a posix threads implementation that >>> might be impossible for a non-POSIX system to implement efficiently; >>> windows, for example, doesn't support signals. >> >> My words above not-withstanding, I am not in any sense an expert on any >> kind of threading, nor of Windows. What does POSIX require of threads >> with regards to signals? > > Off the top of my head, the highlights: > > - threads have their own signal masks, inherited from the creator which > calls pthtead_create. > - signal masks can be manipulated so that a given signal will be > handled in the context of a desired thread. > - sigwait (and several other functions) can be used by a thread to > wait for one or more signals, allowing signals to be process > synchronously, somewhat like message passing. > Semaphores are sig safe, so to speak. It's been a while: https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/sem_post.3.html should be sig safe? Or, am I wrong here Kaz?
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: best approach for multithreading (?) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-12-07 00:16 -0500
Re: best approach for multithreading (?) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 22:37 -0800
Re: best approach for multithreading (?) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-12-07 06:10 -0800
Re: best approach for multithreading (?) Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-12-08 03:49 +0000
Re: best approach for multithreading (?) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 20:36 -0800
Re: best approach for multithreading (?) Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-12-08 09:31 +0000
Re: best approach for multithreading (?) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 15:12 -0800
Re: best approach for multithreading (?) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 15:18 -0800
Re: best approach for multithreading (?) antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2024-12-09 00:39 +0000
csiph-web