Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | JohnF <john@forkosh.com.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: packed structs |
| Date | 2012-09-23 00:19 +0000 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <k3lkhr$85u$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <k3jaun$8al$1@dont-email.me> <e5a6fdcf-0343-4ea9-bfa8-5464c8d355a4@ib4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <k3jua2$l2e$1@reader1.panix.com> <slrnk5ri4f.1d3.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <lnobkxu6mx.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> |
Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote: > Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> writes: > [...] >> Didn't read very carefully, but it's like the Python 'struct' module, >> isn't it? >> >> http://docs.python.org/library/struct.html > > It's also reminiscent of Perl's built-in "pack" and "unpack" functions. > http://perldoc.perl.org/functions/pack.html > http://perldoc.perl.org/functions/unpack.html Thanks, Keith (and Jorgen again), that's also incredibly useful. Lots of food for thought to spec out a C variant. And yet another format/template to peruse. I really should put some effort into learning these "little languages". Despite BartC's remark, "The main problem Python has to deal with is that the language doesn't have structs", I think this kind of pack function has valuable uses in C (along with a scan-like unpack, as suggested by BartC's other remark), e.g., formatting (and reading) binary blocks/packets/whatever, which is what brought the idea to my mind. And the fact that all these little languages have pack/unpack just supports the notion they're useful funcs. Moreover, I'm sure you can see they're no great big deal to code. So why not do it (I'm in the process, but that's no reason others shouldn't do it differently/better/whatever)? The naysayers can just ignore it. I'm sure everybody has their favorite C feature they choose not to use. Finally, regarding Ian's remarks, pack/unpack would be a >>lightweight<< alternative to accomplish this kind of task. Ian's way involves importing additional tool dependencies, possibly turning what could be just a few lines of code into a subtask unto itself. For his large project case, involving lots and lots of different block formats, that may be the best approach (I've worked with Swift at Bankers Trust, albeit a while back, and also with various ticker feeds, etc, etc, and more etc). But that's no reason not to have a lightweight alternative. -- John Forkosh ( mailto: j@f.com where j=john and f=forkosh )
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
packed structs JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-09-22 01:54 +0000
Re: packed structs Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-09-21 23:22 -0400
Re: packed structs JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-09-22 06:37 +0000
Re: packed structs "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-09-22 13:47 +0100
Re: packed structs Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-22 14:00 +0100
Re: packed structs JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-09-22 15:42 +0000
Re: packed structs Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-09-22 09:13 -0400
Re: packed structs Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2012-09-23 03:10 +0200
Re: packed structs JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-09-23 02:10 +0000
Re: packed structs Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-09-23 11:44 -0500
Re: packed structs JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-09-23 23:23 +0000
Re: packed structs Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-24 01:59 +0100
Re: packed structs JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-09-24 02:54 +0000
Re: packed structs Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-24 04:38 +0100
Re: packed structs JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-09-24 04:07 +0000
Re: packed structs Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-24 12:16 +0100
Re: packed structs JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-09-24 11:45 +0000
Re: packed structs "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-09-24 10:18 +0100
Re: packed structs JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-09-24 11:04 +0000
Re: packed structs Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-09-30 14:21 -0500
Re: packed structs JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-10-01 07:34 +0000
Re: packed structs Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-09-30 13:52 -0500
Re: packed structs Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-22 01:31 -0700
Re: packed structs JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-09-22 08:53 +0000
Re: packed structs Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-09-22 14:17 +0000
Re: packed structs JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-09-22 15:33 +0000
Re: packed structs Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-09-22 20:43 +0000
Re: packed structs "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-09-22 22:52 +0100
Re: packed structs Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-22 13:47 -0700
Re: packed structs JohnF <john@forkosh.com.com> - 2012-09-23 00:19 +0000
Re: packed structs Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-23 13:32 +1200
Re: packed structs JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-09-23 02:16 +0000
Re: packed structs Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-23 10:33 +1200
Re: packed structs Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-23 01:38 -0700
Re: packed structs The Great Firewall of China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-21 21:29 -0700
csiph-web