Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #123739
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: C needs to evolve |
| Date | 2017-12-03 11:34 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <f8go4bFrrtU4@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <4d2a3d73-c48a-46e4-96ae-034dc6ae7ea1@googlegroups.com> <ovu71v$p35$7@dont-email.me> <QjxUB.105781$W61.83338@fx08.am4> |
On 12/03/2017 01:50 AM, bartc wrote: > On 02/12/2017 12:28, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> Rick C. Hodgin wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> There are so many advances in other languages which have desirable >>> features. C needs to evolve to include some of those advancements >>> to make it a desirable first-class tool, ... >> >> C has evolved. See C++, Java, C#, Go, .... It is actually quite a long > > Not really. That's like progressing from a small car to a medium one to > a large family car (or to a truck in the case of C++). Most languages that start form a common base grow in a different direction. C++ started with modest aims (C with classes) and grew to meet the needs of its users. Java started with modest intentions and grew to meet the needs of its users and shareholders in RAM manufacturers... > But there is still a need for a small car, except we want one designed > in the 2010s not try and keep the ancient 1970 model on the road (with a > fleet of big support vehicles and technical staff accompanying it on > each journey). Several of my friends enjoy using their 60s and 70s cars. Those that have survived have had the bugs shaken (quite literally round here) out and do all that is required of them. Given the choice of a 60s Cooper S or the current pastiche, I know which I'd choose. -- Ian.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: C needs to evolve Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-12-02 07:28 -0500
Re: C needs to evolve bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-02 12:50 +0000
Re: C needs to evolve Felipe Ferreira <felipefsdev@gmail.com> - 2017-12-02 06:26 -0800
Re: C needs to evolve "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-12-02 08:31 -0800
Re: C needs to evolve "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2017-12-02 17:36 +0100
Re: C needs to evolve Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-12-02 15:40 -0800
Re: C needs to evolve Felipe Ferreira <felipefsdev@gmail.com> - 2017-12-02 17:40 -0800
Re: C needs to evolve Felipe Ferreira <felipefsdev@gmail.com> - 2017-12-02 17:46 -0800
Re: C needs to evolve Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-03 14:53 +1300
Re: C needs to evolve Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-12-02 20:42 -0800
Re: C needs to evolve Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2017-12-02 21:56 -0500
Re: C needs to evolve David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-12-03 19:45 +0100
Re: C needs to evolve Felipe Ferreira <felipefsdev@gmail.com> - 2017-12-03 11:35 -0800
Re: C needs to evolve David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-12-03 21:58 +0100
Re: C needs to evolve James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-12-03 21:01 -0500
Re: C needs to evolve Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-12-03 23:02 -0800
Re: C needs to evolve Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-12-03 12:39 -0800
Re: C needs to evolve David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-12-03 22:07 +0100
Re: C needs to evolve Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-03 11:34 +1300
Re: C needs to evolve Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-12-03 05:25 +0000
Re: C needs to evolve bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-03 12:37 +0000
csiph-web