Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #35479

Re: Baby X

From Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Baby X
Date 2013-08-20 13:09 +1200
Message-ID <b7ftu9Fg6sqU4@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (12 earlier) <ku6pn4$tue$1@dont-email.me> <87bo54y28r.fsf@temporary-address.org.uk> <ku8fjm$juj$1@dont-email.me> <4bQNt.683$nK2.441@en-nntp-11.dc1.easynews.com> <lntxiwlz3c.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Keith Thompson wrote:
>
> You *could* require all possible execution paths for a non-void function
> to lead to a return statement.  C doesn't currently require that kind of
> compile-time analysis, but it's not all that difficult to do, and I
> think I've seen at least one language that requires it.

I recently stumbled upon an interesting blog entry from one of the X.Org 
developers regarding the work such changes can entail:

https://blogs.oracle.com/alanc/entry/solaris_11_1_changes_handling

-- 
Ian Collins

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Baby X Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-07 07:19 +1200
  Re: Baby X Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2013-08-06 12:38 -0700
    Re: Baby X Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-07 07:49 +1200
      Re: Baby X Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2013-08-06 15:17 -0700
        Re: Baby X Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-08-07 00:29 +0100
        Re: Baby X Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-07 13:45 +1200
          Re: Baby X Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2013-08-07 03:22 -0700
            Re: Baby X James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-08-07 06:36 -0400
      Re: Baby X Dr Nick <nospam-4@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2013-08-10 20:04 +0100
    Re: Baby X Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2013-08-09 17:28 +0000
      Re: Baby X Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2013-08-09 12:43 -0700
        Re: Baby X glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-08-09 20:01 +0000
          [OT] Re: Baby X Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-08-09 16:30 -0400
          Re: Baby X Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-08-09 14:12 -0700
            Re: Baby X Dr Nick <nospam-4@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2013-08-10 20:11 +0100
              Re: Baby X Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2013-08-10 14:41 -0500
                Re: Baby X James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-08-10 21:34 -0400
                Re: Baby X Dr Nick <nospam-4@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2013-08-11 11:02 +0100
                Re: Baby X James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-08-11 12:54 -0400
                Re: Baby X Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2013-08-11 13:51 -0400
                Re: Baby X James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-08-11 14:10 -0400
                Re: Baby X Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2013-08-11 14:43 -0400
                Re: Baby X Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-08-11 14:03 -0700
                Re: Baby X Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2013-08-11 17:57 -0400
                Re: Baby X Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-08-11 18:37 -0700
                Re: Baby X glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-08-12 04:12 +0000
                Re: Baby X Dr Nick <nospam-4@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2013-08-12 07:42 +0100
                Re: Baby X Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-08-12 09:10 -0700
                Re: Baby X Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2013-08-17 22:31 -0700
                Re: Baby X James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-08-18 14:50 -0400
                Re: Baby X Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2013-08-18 20:15 +0000
                Re: Baby X James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-08-18 16:30 -0400
                Re: Baby X Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2013-08-18 21:03 +0000
                Re: Baby X Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-20 13:09 +1200
                Re: Baby X Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-08-20 12:24 +0300
                Re: Baby X Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-08-20 13:11 +0100
                Re: Baby X Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-08-20 08:33 -0700
                Re: Baby X Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-08-23 11:32 +0300
                Re: Baby X Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-21 08:01 +1200
                Re: Baby X Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-08-11 13:57 -0700
              Re: Baby X James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-08-10 21:29 -0400
              Re: Baby X Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2013-08-10 22:04 -0700
        Re: Baby X Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2013-08-09 20:16 +0000
          Re: Baby X Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2013-08-09 15:29 -0700
            Re: Baby X Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2013-08-10 05:45 +0000
              Re: Baby X Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2013-08-10 03:18 -0700
                Re: Baby X Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2013-08-10 17:02 +0000

csiph-web