Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #153060
| Subject | Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| References | (1 earlier) <91376443-615e-460c-839c-cf748a673a55o@googlegroups.com> <rdniur$1gtt$1@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk> <4bfaee08-8c31-4f40-b3d3-feafe43991e7o@googlegroups.com> <rdo22u$1qm5$1@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk> <504389b9-f62e-408c-9517-b3a1e488da22o@googlegroups.com> |
| From | Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> |
| Message-ID | <GbQLG.2497$Nfa.2001@fx17.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | Forte - www.forteinc.com |
| Date | 2020-07-03 20:37 -0400 |
On 7/3/20 5:20 PM, Malcolm McLean wrote: > On Friday, 3 July 2020 20:50:08 UTC+1, Richard Tobin wrote: >> In article <4bfaee08-8c31-4f40-b3d3-feafe43991e7o@googlegroups.com>, >> The Real Non Homosexual <cdalten@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> 1. DEFAULT always be FIRST overwrite SECOND >> >>>> You aren't seriously going to combine generated and hand-written >>>> code in one file, are you? >> >>> Sometimes it's necessary. >> >> Nonsense. At the very least you could #include two files. >> > It's maybe not strictly necessary, but MS Visual Studio spits out a > skeleton application for you to edit. The project would have a > strange structure if the handwritten portions had to be placed in > their own file and included. > However if you might have to regenerate the C code, then requiring hand- > editing is a bad idea. > Actually, from what I remember (its been a while since I used tools like that) what they would do is put special comment marks in the code to mark what it would update to regenerate, and what it wouldn't. Something like that would also solve the OPs basic problem. Before generating the skeleton dummy version see if it exists in the user to edit section, and only create the dummy if it isn't there. If the definition for the dummy might change based on other things, put it in the generated code section, with a comment to move it if updating it. If the definition will be fixed, just add it as the skeleton in the user to edit section.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
missing gcc attribute "overwritable" aotto1968zwei@gmail.com - 2020-07-02 00:31 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2020-07-02 01:38 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-02 12:03 +0200
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2020-07-02 06:18 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-07-02 16:33 +0000
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" aotto1968zwei@gmail.com - 2020-07-02 10:57 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2020-07-02 10:21 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-07-02 10:42 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" aotto1968zwei@gmail.com - 2020-07-02 10:56 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-07-02 11:33 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2020-07-02 19:53 +0100
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" donalhambra@gmail.com - 2020-07-02 19:32 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2020-07-03 00:30 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" aotto1968zwei@gmail.com - 2020-07-03 00:36 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2020-07-03 06:32 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2020-07-03 07:08 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-07-09 10:02 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" aotto1968zwei@gmail.com - 2020-07-03 00:37 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2020-07-03 15:30 +0000
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" The Real Non Homosexual <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2020-07-03 11:51 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2020-07-03 19:48 +0000
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2020-07-03 14:20 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-07-03 20:37 -0400
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" aotto1968zwei@gmail.com - 2020-07-05 01:34 -0700
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2020-07-05 09:45 -0400
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2020-07-05 20:23 +0200
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-07-05 19:09 -0400
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2020-07-05 23:37 +0000
Re: missing gcc attribute "overwritable" David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-06 08:27 +0200
csiph-web