Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #8500

Re: #define with semicolon

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: #define with semicolon
Date 2011-07-19 11:23 -0700
Message-ID <CA4B19C1.9F68F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <CA45EC05.9F097%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <lny5zznvd6.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <CA45F1AD.9F0A6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <4e25c786@news.x-privat.org> <e7abab8c-3b8e-45b1-a869-2df654822ae4@o18g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


cc stated in post 
e7abab8c-3b8e-45b1-a869-2df654822ae4@o18g2000yqm.googlegroups.com on 7/19/11
11:18 AM:

> On Jul 19, 2:05 pm, "cc" <scatn...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Snit wrote:
>>> Keith Thompson stated in post lny5zznvd6....@nuthaus.mib.org on
>>> 7/15/11 1:26 PM:
>> 
>>>> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
>>>>> cc stated in post
>>>>> 30a60455-46bc-45b8-9fbd-11a284c62...@e7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com on
>>>>> 7/15/11 10:37 AM:
>> 
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> But ok, by your own description you misstated your relationship
>>>>>>> with the person who made the suggestion. You describe that
>>>>>>> misstatement as a joke, but you made it in a context where nobody
>>>>>>> would have any reason to think it wasn't serious. I certainly had
>>>>>>> no reason to doubt that the person in question is "a very good
>>>>>>> friend" of yours (and very little reason to care).
>> 
>>>>>> It was an inside joke, and irrelevant to the code anyway.
>> 
>>>>> Why would you tell an "inside joke" to an "outside" group?  That
>>>>> makes no sense.  And, according to you, not only did I call you on
>>>>> it, but someone became "very upset" with you about it (you have not
>>>>> said who).
>> 
>>>> Snit, perhaps you could discuss this with him somewhere else (or
>>>> at least refrain from doing so here).  We knew nothing of your
>>>> involvement in this before you started posting here.
>> 
>>> I just do not want him spreading his lies about me here.  He has a
>>> habit of making up quotes about me and just out and out lying.
>> 
>>> What is weird is that our two main debates were about nothing a
>>> reasonable person would find offensive.  One: I noted that in UI
>>> design there are well established guidelines / principles and, two, I
>>> noted that I think there is "too much" abuse of power by the police
>>> and others.
>> 
>>>> You may well have legitimate greivances with "cc", but unless
>>>> they're relevant to the C programming language, anyone here who's
>>>> interested in hearing about them can easily go to wherever this
>>>> dispute started and read about them there.
>> 
>>> Frankly I have no idea why cc even brought the silly debate here.  I
>>> specifically asked him *not* to.
>> 
>>> From COLA:
>> 
>>>  cc:
>>>    -----
>>>    Beyond that, I suggest you let everyone in clc know I was
>>>    dishonest, and for what reasons.
>>>    -----
>>>  Snit:
>>>    -----
>>>    Huh? Why would I talk about you to other people. My
>>>    goodness you think the world revolves around you.
>>>    -----
>>>  cc:
>>>    -----
>>>    Well if I was being lied to, I would like to know.
>>>    -----
>>>  Snit:
>>>    -----
>>>    Who said anyone was lying to you?  And, frankly, why would
>>>    you care if you were lied to about some people you know
>>>    nothing about?  But if you are feeling bad about your lying
>>>    then *you* should go confess.  Why do you want me to do
>>>    your dirty work?
>>>    -----
>> 
>>> And then he said he *did* post here - so I read what he wrote.
>> 
>> You sure beg for attention a lot.
>> 
> 
> Interesting forgery. Seems kind of unnecessary though, no?

Based on the headers I think Carroll is trying to get in on the fun... but,
hey, given how you keep forging my name as you fabricate quotes and
attribute them to me, you should have no problem with him forging your name?

Right?

I mean, after all - you clearly have decided forgeries are OK in your book.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

#define with semicolon cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-13 11:19 -0700
  Re: #define with semicolon Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-13 12:38 -0700
    Re: #define with semicolon cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-13 12:56 -0700
      Re: #define with semicolon Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2011-07-13 21:09 +0100
      Re: #define with semicolon Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-13 13:30 -0700
        Re: #define with semicolon Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> - 2011-07-14 13:03 +0200
        Re: #define with semicolon Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 05:27 -0700
        Re: #define with semicolon Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2011-07-15 10:54 -0400
          Re: #define with semicolon Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-15 09:05 -0700
            Re: #define with semicolon Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-15 11:49 -0500
        Re: #define with semicolon Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2011-07-21 15:31 +0200
          Re: #define with semicolon "J. J. Farrell" <jjf@bcs.org.uk> - 2011-07-22 01:51 +0100
      Re: #define with semicolon Harald van Dijk <truedfx@gmail.com> - 2011-07-13 13:51 -0700
        Re: #define with semicolon Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-13 14:01 -0700
          Re: #define with semicolon Harald van Dijk <truedfx@gmail.com> - 2011-07-13 14:14 -0700
      Re: #define with semicolon Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-07-13 17:10 -0600
        Re: #define with semicolon Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-13 16:20 -0700
        Re: #define with semicolon Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-07-14 14:03 +0300
      Re: #define with semicolon Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-07-14 01:22 +0100
      Re: #define with semicolon Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-07-22 15:50 +0300
        Re: #define with semicolon Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-07-22 21:46 +0000
          Re: #define with semicolon Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-23 09:54 +1200
            Re: #define with semicolon Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-07-22 22:21 +0000
              Re: #define with semicolon Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-07-23 00:12 +0000
                Re: #define with semicolon Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 00:37 +0000
                Re: #define with semicolon Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-07-23 09:55 +0000
          Re: #define with semicolon Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-07-22 15:54 -0600
          Re: #define with semicolon Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-07-23 01:14 +0300
            Re: #define with semicolon Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-07-22 22:28 +0000
              Re: #define with semicolon Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-07-23 02:52 +0300
                Re: #define with semicolon Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 00:14 +0000
          Re: #define with semicolon Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-22 16:52 -0700
            Re: #define with semicolon Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 00:07 +0000
  Re: #define with semicolon Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-07-13 13:04 -0700
  Re: #define with semicolon Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2011-07-13 17:11 -0700
  Re: #define with semicolon Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2011-07-14 08:11 -0400
  Re: #define with semicolon pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-07-14 08:24 -0400
  Re: #define with semicolon "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-07-14 17:34 +0200
  Re: #define with semicolon cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-15 04:12 -0700
    Re: #define with semicolon Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@wegge.dk> - 2011-07-15 14:49 +0200
    Re: #define with semicolon Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-07-15 08:37 -0700
      Re: #define with semicolon "cc" <scatnubs@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-19 11:03 -0700
    Re: #define with semicolon Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-15 09:23 -0700
      Re: #define with semicolon cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-15 10:37 -0700
        Re: #define with semicolon Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-07-15 13:07 -0700
          Re: #define with semicolon Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-15 13:26 -0700
            Re: #define with semicolon Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-07-15 13:31 -0700
              Re: #define with semicolon cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-19 08:55 -0700
                Re: #define with semicolon "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-07-19 14:12 -0700
              Re: #define with semicolon "cc" <scatnubs@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-19 11:05 -0700
                Re: #define with semicolon cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-19 11:18 -0700
                Re: #define with semicolon Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-07-19 11:23 -0700
                Re: #define with semicolon cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-19 11:31 -0700
          Re: #define with semicolon "cc" <scatnubs@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-19 11:05 -0700
      Re: #define with semicolon Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-07-15 10:51 -0700
        Re: #define with semicolon "cc" <scatnubs@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-19 11:04 -0700
          Re: #define with semicolon "J. J. Farrell" <jjf@bcs.org.uk> - 2011-07-20 00:53 +0100
            Re: #define with semicolon Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-07-19 16:57 -0700
  Re: #define with semicolon gordonb.ethca@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-07-15 10:33 -0500
  Re: #define with semicolon Michael Angelo Ravera <maravera@prodigy.net> - 2011-07-22 10:55 -0700

csiph-web