Re: Is this defined behavior?

From	Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Is this defined behavior?
Date	2024-02-04 13:31 -0800
Organization	None to speak of
Message-ID	<87v873lxvh.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <8734uaq19p.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <8634ua9bts.fsf@linuxsc.com> <uploc3$36iui$1@dont-email.me> <upnvla$3l4rm$1@dont-email.me> <upo9ov$3mq1h$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> writes:
> On 04/02/2024 12:24, David Brown wrote:
>> You /have/ taken a position, and you /have/ criticised Tim for his
>> post - by making this complaint.
>
> Other people have made that complaint. I'm not making it myself. But
> other people have said this, so it is therefore an issue.
>
> I want other people's views, and thnk you for giving yours.

You haven't given your views.  You've just falsely claimed that it's
"also fair to say that it's the sort of post which gives the newgroup a
bad reputation".

I think you're trying to start an argument while pretending to be above
the fray.  I don't know or care why.

If you have something to say about what was wrong with Tim's post,
you're free to say it.  If not, please drop this -- and I suggest that
others not take the bait.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Medtronic
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Is this defined behavior? Anthony Cuozzo <anthony@cuozzo.us> - 2024-02-02 10:56 -0500
  Re: Is this defined behavior? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-02-02 08:28 -0800
    Re: Is this defined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-02-03 00:44 -0800
      Re: Is this defined behavior? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-02-03 16:07 +0000
        Re: Is this defined behavior? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-02-03 13:41 -0800
          Re: Is this defined behavior? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-02-04 03:18 +0000
            Re: Is this defined behavior? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-02-03 19:48 -0800
              Re: Is this defined behavior? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-02-04 04:34 +0000
        Re: Is this defined behavior? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-02-04 13:24 +0100
          Re: Is this defined behavior? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-02-04 15:16 +0000
            Re: Is this defined behavior? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-02-04 13:31 -0800
              Re: Is this defined behavior? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-02-04 23:18 +0000
                Re: Is this defined behavior? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-02-04 15:56 -0800
                Re: Is this defined behavior? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-02-05 00:05 +0000
                Re: Is this defined behavior? Poprocks <please@replytogroup.com> - 2024-02-05 13:35 -0500
                Re: Is this defined behavior? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-02-06 13:10 +0000
                Is this sane behavior? (Was: Is this defined behavior?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-02-06 14:52 +0000
                Re: Is this sane behavior? (Was: Is this defined behavior?) Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-02-06 15:50 +0000
              Re: Is this defined behavior? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-02-04 23:21 -0800
          Re: Is this defined behavior? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-02-04 15:27 +0000
            Re: Is this defined behavior? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-02-04 18:23 +0100

csiph-web