Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #394198

Re: VAX

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.arch, comp.lang.c
Subject Re: VAX
Date Mon, 18 Aug 2025 21:57:59 -0700
Organization None to speak of
Lines 31
Message-ID <87tt236h7s.fsf@example.invalid> (permalink)
References <0c857b8347f07f3a0ca61c403d0a8711@www.novabbs.com> <2025Jul30.075918@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <slrn108kkt8.efbg.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <2025Aug1.191648@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <kr7jQ.442699$Tc12.355083@fx17.iad> <106jvc3$qan0$1@dont-email.me> <106kh0k$18ipb$1@paganini.bofh.team> <2025Aug3.185110@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <106otf6$1sov2$1@dont-email.me> <106p4k6$1u13o$1@dont-email.me> <20250804121938.0000122a@yahoo.com> <2025Aug4.140932@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2025Aug4.165141@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <20250804182839.00000600@yahoo.com> <87sei7do4g.fsf@example.invalid> <20250804220315.00007240@yahoo.com> <20250805140647.927@kylheku.com> <107t6ds$2gluc$1@dont-email.me> <874iu56wd7.fsf@example.invalid> <107uoi3$2u253$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Injection-Date Tue, 19 Aug 2025 04:58:02 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info dont-email.me; posting-host="03176664c410d3468462ee555d8a3862"; logging-data="3728509"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18sxfVEnErSsptCmV/Vaq+e"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock sha1:mjH2ZBuZciIdZkG9qL0Q64n/GNg= sha1:KBHG7kpW+SJHAU/ghvIcwrYlOts=
Xref csiph.com comp.arch:113183 comp.lang.c:394198

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
> On 18.08.2025 07:18, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> Jakob Bohm <egenagwemdimtapsar@jbohm.dk> writes:
>> [...]
>>> I am unsure how GCC --pedantic deals with the standards-contrary
>>> features in the GNUC89 language, such as the different type of (foo,
>>> 'C') (GNUC says char, C89 says int), maybe specifying standard C
>>> instead of GNUC reverts those to the standard definition .
>> I'm not sure what you're referring to.  You didn't say what foo is.
>> I believe that in all versions of C, the result of a comma operator
>> has
>> the type and value of its right operand, and the type of an unprefixed
>> character constant is int.
>> Can you show a complete example where `sizeof (foo, 'C')` yields
>> sizeof (int) in any version of GNUC?
>
> Presumably that's a typo - you meant to ask when the size is /not/ the
> size of "int" ?  After all, you said yourself that "(foo, 'C')"
> evaluates to 'C' which is of type "int".  It would be very interesting
> if Jakob can show an example where gcc treats the expression as any
> other type than "int".

Yes (more of a thinko, actually).

I meant to ask about `sizeof (foo, 'C')` yielding a value *other than*
`sizeof (int)`.  Jakob implies a difference in this area between GNU C
and ISO C.  I'm not aware of any.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 18:28 +0300
  Re: VAX Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-08-04 09:53 -0700
    Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 22:03 +0300
      Re: VAX James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-08-04 15:25 -0400
        Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-04 22:40 +0300
          Re: VAX "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-08-04 12:44 -0700
          Re: VAX Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-08-04 22:21 -0700
            Re: VAX Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-08-05 21:25 +0000
              Re: VAX Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-08-05 19:14 -0700
                Re: VAX Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-08-06 04:31 +0000
                Re: VAX Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-06 11:48 +0300
              Re: VAX James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-08-06 11:56 -0400
                Re: VAX Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-12-15 11:51 -0800
          Re: VAX Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-08-05 21:13 +0000
            Re: VAX James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-08-06 11:54 -0400
              Re: VAX Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-08-06 13:58 -0700
                Re: VAX Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-06 21:33 -0800
      Re: VAX Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-08-05 21:08 +0000
        Re: VAX Jakob Bohm <egenagwemdimtapsar@jbohm.dk> - 2025-08-17 20:18 +0200
          Re: VAX Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 22:18 -0700
            Re: VAX Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-08-18 08:02 +0100
            Re: VAX David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-08-18 11:34 +0200
              Re: VAX Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 21:57 -0700
    Re: VAX Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-06 21:14 -0800

csiph-web