Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?
Date	Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:28:31 -0700
Organization	None to speak of
Lines	18
Message-ID	<87msdpdb9s.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink)
References	<87h640gvyr.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
Injection-Date	Thu, 13 Mar 2025 01:28:34 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; posting-host="5cc63718fae4e0a1d8a3e7d5e0bb6717"; logging-data="3041389"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/0Rf6cjYRZXIHwr+HPNEM"
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:FDF9YPQeck+Lt5/GDOSgr65mti4= sha1:HXewwWXDcknJJfUy3rN3Aa76uCU=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.c:391115

Show key headers only | View raw

Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
> I just saw a post on news.announce.newgroups posted 2025-01-03, subject
> "1st RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator".
>
> "This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove the following
> 101 moderated newsgroups."
>
> comp.lang.c.moderated is on the list.
[...]

There's some more discussion of this in news.announce.newgroups, on the
thread "3rd RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator".
n.a.n is moderated, so there may be some delay before articles posted
there appear.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 19:08 -0700
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 20:17 -0700
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-11 09:00 +0100
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? John McCue <jmccue@qball.jmcunx.com> - 2025-03-13 14:39 +0000
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-11 21:28 -0700
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-12 04:37 +0000
      Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-03-13 01:23 +0000
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 23:24 -0700
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-12 09:14 +0000
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 17:28 -0700

csiph-web