Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #385020

Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?

From Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++, comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?
Date 2024-05-24 12:57 -0700
Organization None to speak of
Message-ID <877cfj2dbh.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <cone.1716501172.972762.219193.1004@monster.email-scan.com> <v2oeuu$1urqv$1@dont-email.me> <cone.1716513008.662818.236297.1004@monster.email-scan.com> <v2oq1p$24966$1@dont-email.me> <cone.1716550962.2017.287830.1004@monster.email-scan.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Sam <sam@email-scan.com> writes:
> olcott writes:
>
>>>
>>> As I already explained, it's syntactically invalid C, that no self-
>>> respecting C compiler will accept as well-formed code.
>>>
>>
>> Fibber !
>>
>> On 5/20/2024 9:23 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> > The code as presented is a valid C *translation unit*, but it is
>> > not a valid *program*, and it has no behavior.
>> >
>
> Please stop accusing Mr. Thompson. He's only telling you the truth:
> the shown code "is not a valid *program*". Which part of that you did
> not understand? If you don't believe me, just ask Keith Thompson.

I don't read what olcott posts to comp.lang.c or comp.lang.c++, but it
appears that he was accusing you, Sam, not me.  (I have no reason to
think you're lying, but I do think you statement is either incorrect or
unclear.)

> That should be the last word on this: your code is not a valid
> program. Thank you for playing. You can go home now.

Sam, your claim that it's "syntactically invalid C" is incorrect, unless
you're quibbling about the line numbers that are obviously not intended
to be part of the code.

Are the line numbers the reason you say it's syntactically invalid?

The code olcott posted, with the line numbers removed, is syntactically
valid C.  It is not a complete program due to the lack of a definition
for one of the functions.  It could be part of a complete program (one
about which, as it happens, I don't care).

Sam, are you trolling?  If you're trolling olcott, I don't care, but
please don't do it in comp.lang.c and comp.lang.c++.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 11:52 -0500
  Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in         recursive simulation? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-23 17:52 -0400
    Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 17:11 -0500
      Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in         recursive simulation? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-23 21:10 -0400
        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 20:20 -0500
          Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 18:27 -0700
          Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in         recursive simulation? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-24 07:42 -0400
            Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in         recursive simulation? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-05-24 13:57 +0000
              Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 12:04 -0500
            Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 12:57 -0700
              Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 15:55 -0500
                Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-25 12:57 -0700
        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 21:08 -0500
        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 19:34 -0700
          Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 22:57 -0500
        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 08:01 -0500
          Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in         recursive simulation? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-24 13:27 -0400
    Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 16:19 -0700
  Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-05-24 13:10 +0100
    Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 08:08 -0500
      Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-05-24 15:37 +0200
        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 12:03 -0500
      Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-24 16:05 +0200
      Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-24 16:28 +0200
      Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-05-25 12:48 +0300
        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-25 06:32 -0500
  Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-24 17:01 +0200
    Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 11:57 -0500
      Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-24 20:52 +0200
        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 14:20 -0500
        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-05-25 13:03 +0300
          Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-25 06:45 -0500
      Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-05-25 12:59 +0300
        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-25 06:42 -0500
          Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-05-26 11:05 +0300
            D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 08:12 -0500
              Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-05-26 19:04 +0300
                Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 11:54 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-05-27 11:47 +0300
  Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-25 09:32 +0200
    Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-25 06:22 -0500
      Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-26 12:57 +0200
    Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-05-25 16:48 +0100
      D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-25 12:46 -0500
      D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its own line 06---TOC divergence olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-25 14:41 -0500
    Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-25 23:19 -0500
      Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-26 13:01 +0200
        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 08:20 -0500
          Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-26 16:43 +0200
            Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 10:42 -0500
              Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-27 10:57 +0200
                D correctly simulated by H never halts olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-27 09:00 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-28 11:11 +0200
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-28 09:11 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-28 13:11 -0700
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-28 17:12 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-05-29 06:24 +0800
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-28 18:12 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-28 18:36 -0700
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-28 20:50 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts tTh <tth@none.invalid> - 2024-05-29 03:53 +0200
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-28 21:15 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-28 20:05 -0700
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-28 22:29 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-28 22:33 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-28 21:54 -0700
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-29 07:56 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-29 08:34 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-29 11:51 -0700
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-29 14:16 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-29 11:59 -0700
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-29 12:09 -0700
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts tTh <tth@none.invalid> - 2024-05-29 05:38 +0200
                Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-28 23:07 -0500

csiph-web