Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.c > #392412
| From | Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types" |
| Date | 2025-04-11 12:48 -0700 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <871ptyscn0.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <867c3qbqrx.fsf@linuxsc.com> |
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
[...]
> Incidentally, [unadorned int] is meant to reflect the difference
> between using 'int' and 'signed int' for the type of a bitfield.
> I don't know if that distinction still exists in C23.
It does.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types" Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-04-11 09:34 -0700 Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types" Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 12:48 -0700
csiph-web