Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types" Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:48:19 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 11 Message-ID: <871ptyscn0.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <867c3qbqrx.fsf@linuxsc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 21:48:25 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c7132c9dc01e9da84b004e8ef39b7407"; logging-data="2384762"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++MqOTkmM/DzP5jQBAe25+" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:xeJeoUsb575Edx+Qtt3j1hENP90= sha1:Jci3XxvaG3g8YOHrS24CfO/oX8E= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:392412 Tim Rentsch writes: [...] > Incidentally, [unadorned int] is meant to reflect the difference > between using 'int' and 'signed int' for the type of a bitfield. > I don't know if that distinction still exists in C23. It does. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */