Re: function pointer question

From	Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: function pointer question
Date	2026-01-03 16:48 -0800
Organization	None to speak of
Message-ID	<871pk64307.fsf@example.invalid> (permalink)
References	<10j7rs6$7c9e$1@dont-email.me> <20260102091518.226@kylheku.com> <10j96mn$jrsp$1@dont-email.me> <10jc4n0$1ijf2$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
[...]
> Similarly, in C, the declaration "int foo()" is an old-style K&R
> declaration that says that foo is a function that takes an unspecified
> number of arguments of unspecified types. K&R declarations were found to
> be too error-prone, but the language still allows them for backwards
> compatibility. When C was first standardized, K&R declarations were
> replace with prototype declarations which specified the type of each
> argument, which allowed error checking.
> The natural way for a prototype declaration to say "no arguments" would
> have been to simply specify no arguments, and C++ uses that approach.
> However, since C still supports the old K&R declarations, a different
> method was used. "int foo(void)" is a function prototype that says that
> foo doesn't take any arguments.
[...]

Some of this changed in C23.  I don't have all the details off the top
of my head, but as I understand it old-style function definitions
are no longer allowed and `int foo()` is equivalent to `int foo(void)`.

(Which means, I think, that my argument that `int main()` has undefined
behavior does not apply in C23.)

It's still not a bad idea to write (void) on a parameterless function
declaration/definition unless you're sure your code will be compiled
only with a compiler that implements C23 or later.

The 2023 ISO C standard is expensive, but the closest draft is:

https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3220.pdf

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 07:24 +0000
  Re: function pointer question Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-02 09:04 +0000
    Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 14:42 +0000
    Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 14:45 +0000
  Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-02 02:52 -0800
    Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 14:43 +0000
      Re: function pointer question highcrew <high.crew3868@fastmail.com> - 2026-01-02 17:21 +0100
        Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-02 09:37 -0800
        Re: function pointer question Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2026-01-03 03:33 +0000
          Re: function pointer question Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2026-01-03 07:41 -0800
            Re: function pointer question Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-03 21:46 +0000
              Re: function pointer question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-01-04 12:03 +0100
            Re: function pointer question Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2026-01-06 20:41 +0000
              Re: function pointer question Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2026-01-07 07:18 -0800
                Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-07 21:52 -0800
                Re: function pointer question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-01-08 09:17 +0100
  Re: function pointer question Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2026-01-02 17:48 +0000
    Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 19:35 +0000
      Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-02 12:07 -0800
        Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-03 06:06 +0000
      Re: function pointer question Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2026-01-02 21:50 +0000
      Re: function pointer question Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2026-01-02 21:52 +0000
        Re: function pointer question "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-01-02 14:18 -0800
          Re: function pointer question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-01-03 13:55 +0100
            Re: function pointer question "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-01-03 12:04 -0800
              Re: function pointer question Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2026-01-03 13:01 -0800
                Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-07 07:35 -0800
                Re: function pointer question Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2026-01-07 08:17 -0800
                Re: function pointer question Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2026-01-07 08:23 -0800
                Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-07 18:44 -0800
                Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-07 18:27 -0800
              Re: function pointer question Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-03 22:05 +0000
            Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-03 16:39 -0800
              Re: function pointer question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-01-04 12:15 +0100
            Re: function pointer question Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2026-01-06 20:33 +0000
              Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-06 17:01 -0800
        Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-03 06:08 +0000
          Re: function pointer question "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-01-05 12:40 -0800
            Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 04:30 +0000
              Re: function pointer question "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-01-06 17:05 -0800
      Re: function pointer question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-01-03 17:20 -0500
        Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-03 16:48 -0800
        Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-05 08:39 +0000
          Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 12:32 +0000
            Re: function pointer question highcrew <high.crew3868@fastmail.com> - 2026-01-06 13:59 +0100
              Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 13:57 +0000
              Re: function pointer question antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-01-06 14:50 +0000
                Re: function pointer question highcrew <high.crew3868@fastmail.com> - 2026-01-06 21:44 +0100
                Re: function pointer question scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-01-06 22:08 +0000
                Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-07 05:59 -0800
                Re: function pointer question antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-01-07 09:25 +0000
                Re: function pointer question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-01-07 11:37 +0100
            Re: function pointer question Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-01-06 15:47 +0200
              Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 14:01 +0000
            Re: function pointer question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-01-06 15:55 +0100
              Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 16:44 +0000
            Re: function pointer question scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-01-06 15:41 +0000
              Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 16:45 +0000
            Re: function pointer question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-01-06 10:58 -0500
              Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 16:49 +0000
                Re: function pointer question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-01-06 12:09 -0500
                Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-07 21:18 +0000
              Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-09 09:14 -0800
              Re: function pointer question Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2026-01-10 19:17 -0800
                Re: function pointer question "James Russell Kuyper Jr." <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-01-10 22:39 -0500
                Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-11 11:49 -0800
        Re: function pointer question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-01-05 06:47 -0500
  Re: function pointer question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-01-02 14:03 -0500
    Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 19:41 +0000
  Re: function pointer question bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-01-02 19:18 +0000
    Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-02 11:43 -0800
    Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 19:44 +0000

csiph-web