Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.c > #396265
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: function pointer question |
| Date | 2026-01-07 07:35 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86bjj5phai.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <10j9enb$p6ts$2@dont-email.me> <10j9g71$pr9o$1@dont-email.me> <10jb3j5$17gcb$3@dont-email.me> <10jbsp0$1gf7e$1@dont-email.me> <10jc02j$1hk1n$1@dont-email.me> |
Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> writes:
> On Sat 1/3/2026 12:04 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>> struct object_prv_vtable {
>> int (*fp_destroy) (void* const);
>> };
>
> And interesting piece of trivia about C function types and function
> type compatibility rules is that:
>
> 1. Top-level qualifiers on function parameters are preserved as part
> of function type.
Not completely wrong but not exactly right either.
> However, such top-level qualifiers are ignored when
> determining function type compatibility.
It's easier to take the point of view that top-level qualifiers
for function parameters don't participate in the type of the
function as a whole. Taking that view is easier to understand
and gives results that are indistinguishable from the actual
rules.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 07:24 +0000
Re: function pointer question Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-02 09:04 +0000
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 14:42 +0000
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 14:45 +0000
Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-02 02:52 -0800
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 14:43 +0000
Re: function pointer question highcrew <high.crew3868@fastmail.com> - 2026-01-02 17:21 +0100
Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-02 09:37 -0800
Re: function pointer question Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2026-01-03 03:33 +0000
Re: function pointer question Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2026-01-03 07:41 -0800
Re: function pointer question Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-03 21:46 +0000
Re: function pointer question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-01-04 12:03 +0100
Re: function pointer question Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2026-01-06 20:41 +0000
Re: function pointer question Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2026-01-07 07:18 -0800
Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-07 21:52 -0800
Re: function pointer question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-01-08 09:17 +0100
Re: function pointer question Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2026-01-02 17:48 +0000
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 19:35 +0000
Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-02 12:07 -0800
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-03 06:06 +0000
Re: function pointer question Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2026-01-02 21:50 +0000
Re: function pointer question Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2026-01-02 21:52 +0000
Re: function pointer question "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-01-02 14:18 -0800
Re: function pointer question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-01-03 13:55 +0100
Re: function pointer question "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-01-03 12:04 -0800
Re: function pointer question Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2026-01-03 13:01 -0800
Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-07 07:35 -0800
Re: function pointer question Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2026-01-07 08:17 -0800
Re: function pointer question Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2026-01-07 08:23 -0800
Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-07 18:44 -0800
Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-07 18:27 -0800
Re: function pointer question Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-03 22:05 +0000
Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-03 16:39 -0800
Re: function pointer question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-01-04 12:15 +0100
Re: function pointer question Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2026-01-06 20:33 +0000
Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-06 17:01 -0800
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-03 06:08 +0000
Re: function pointer question "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-01-05 12:40 -0800
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 04:30 +0000
Re: function pointer question "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-01-06 17:05 -0800
Re: function pointer question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-01-03 17:20 -0500
Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-03 16:48 -0800
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-05 08:39 +0000
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 12:32 +0000
Re: function pointer question highcrew <high.crew3868@fastmail.com> - 2026-01-06 13:59 +0100
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 13:57 +0000
Re: function pointer question antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-01-06 14:50 +0000
Re: function pointer question highcrew <high.crew3868@fastmail.com> - 2026-01-06 21:44 +0100
Re: function pointer question scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-01-06 22:08 +0000
Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-07 05:59 -0800
Re: function pointer question antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-01-07 09:25 +0000
Re: function pointer question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-01-07 11:37 +0100
Re: function pointer question Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-01-06 15:47 +0200
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 14:01 +0000
Re: function pointer question David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-01-06 15:55 +0100
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 16:44 +0000
Re: function pointer question scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-01-06 15:41 +0000
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 16:45 +0000
Re: function pointer question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-01-06 10:58 -0500
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-06 16:49 +0000
Re: function pointer question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-01-06 12:09 -0500
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-07 21:18 +0000
Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-09 09:14 -0800
Re: function pointer question Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2026-01-10 19:17 -0800
Re: function pointer question "James Russell Kuyper Jr." <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-01-10 22:39 -0500
Re: function pointer question Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-11 11:49 -0800
Re: function pointer question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-01-05 06:47 -0500
Re: function pointer question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-01-02 14:03 -0500
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 19:41 +0000
Re: function pointer question bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-01-02 19:18 +0000
Re: function pointer question Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-02 11:43 -0800
Re: function pointer question Michael Sanders <porkchop@invalid.foo> - 2026-01-02 19:44 +0000
csiph-web