Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #384941
| Path | csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Good hash for pointers |
| Date | Thu, 23 May 2024 16:52:03 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 17 |
| Message-ID | <86r0dshysc.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | <v2n88p$1nlcc$1@dont-email.me> <86v834i1o9.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v2okbv$1vp4n$2@dont-email.me> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Injection-Date | Fri, 24 May 2024 01:52:04 +0200 (CEST) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="4e2ccf3374e48a9f13e87ba250cb95a8"; logging-data="2091468"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/BgrphSugA5tzhgJRoMcHCl5LOYz5bLPk=" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:E5N3W4I6TiFiT2EQtblAMFcKXnY= sha1:w3O21MWROms7F9Xqbw9Uj+P9tB4= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:384941 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> writes: > On 23/05/2024 23:49, Tim Rentsch wrote: > >> Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> What is a good hash function for pointers to use in portable >>> ANSI C? >> >> I have a preliminary question. Do you really mean ANSI C, or >> is C99 acceptable? > > C89 is better. > But the pass has been sold. I'm not asking which you think is better. I'm asking about what your requirements are.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Good hash for pointers Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 12:11 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-05-23 15:37 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 15:51 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 00:42 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-05-23 20:34 +0000
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-23 15:49 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 00:43 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-23 16:52 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 01:28 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-23 18:39 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-05-24 11:14 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 12:05 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 10:49 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 10:51 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-24 06:18 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 15:07 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-05-24 14:51 +0000
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-25 02:49 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-05-24 17:00 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 17:10 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-05-24 19:27 +0300
Re: Good hash for pointers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-05-24 09:41 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 17:32 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 18:59 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2024-05-24 04:09 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 20:28 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 19:57 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-05-25 00:54 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-25 02:12 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-05-25 12:28 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-25 11:12 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-05-25 20:31 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-25 22:54 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-25 17:00 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-25 10:40 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-05-25 18:56 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-25 11:23 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-05-25 23:13 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-05-25 23:07 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-05-25 23:42 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-05-26 19:58 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-05-26 22:42 +0000
Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 18:05 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 18:07 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 18:04 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-26 09:24 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 18:36 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-26 10:20 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 19:39 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 19:54 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-27 08:07 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-05-28 11:07 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-30 10:10 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-30 11:27 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-30 19:26 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-30 19:27 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-02 10:45 +0300
Re: Good hash for pointers "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 12:42 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-02 16:02 -0700
Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-03 10:50 +0300
Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 20:06 +0200
Re: Good hash for pointers Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 20:10 +0100
Re: Good hash for pointers Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-26 20:24 +0200
csiph-web