Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?
Date	Tue, 11 Mar 2025 21:28:28 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	35
Message-ID	<86h63yub2r.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink)
References	<87h640gvyr.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date	Wed, 12 Mar 2025 05:28:29 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; posting-host="8a44bfd8bf43fbb56645d61d7bf749d4"; logging-data="2566302"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+b9cP9Jpbf6uP5/sU0KGtZg5LRg0nnPfg="
User-Agent	Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:/nXKj40lNNQaMN+TIHqc+mCbzPo= sha1:f0fgXKAzJOtVY1/9gEZkJlUobcM=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.c:391070

Show key headers only | View raw

Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:

> I just saw a post on news.announce.newgroups posted 2025-01-03, subject
> "1st RfD:  Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator".
>
> "This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove the following
> 101 moderated newsgroups."
>
> comp.lang.c.moderated is on the list.
>
> Seebs was the moderator of comp.lang.c.moderated, but has
> not participated since 2014.  There have been no posts on
> comp.lang.c.moderated since then.
>
> There have been discussions here in comp.lang.c in 2018 and 2021
> about reviving comp.lang.c.moderated.  I emailed Seebs about this
> at the time, and he expressed tentative interesting in seeing it
> revived, but with someone else moderating it.
>
> My tentative opinion is that it's probably not worth reviving,
> but if others are sufficiently interested *and* someone volunteers
> to moderate it, perhaps it could be done.  If it were revived,
> I'd certainly subscribe and participate.
>
> One possible concern is that if comp.lang.c.moderated is removed,
> historical posts might be lost.  I don't know whether that's
> a valid concern.  It might depend on the policies of individual
> Usenet servers and archives.

I am in favor of reviving comp.lang.c.moderated, and hope a
suitable moderating arrangement can be found.

Technical question:  is it feasible to have moderating duties
be shared among several people on some sort of rotating basis?
I have no experience moderating a usenet news group.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 19:08 -0700
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 20:17 -0700
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-11 09:00 +0100
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? John McCue <jmccue@qball.jmcunx.com> - 2025-03-13 14:39 +0000
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-11 21:28 -0700
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-12 04:37 +0000
      Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-03-13 01:23 +0000
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 23:24 -0700
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-12 09:14 +0000
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 17:28 -0700

csiph-web