Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #391866
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: A question regarding C string functions |
| Date | 2025-04-02 17:36 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <865xjmhyih.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | <vsjujs$21log$1@dont-email.me> |
Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> writes: > I cannot find any definitive statement in my copies of the various > C language standards that addresses the behaviour of the C string > functions when given a NULL pointer. > > Specifically, what does the C standard dictate about the behaviour of > strrchr(NULL,'/') > but the question could apply to any of the string functions > (strlen(NULL), etc.) > > My gut impression is that > strrchr(NULL,'/'), etc > invoke undefined behaviour, and should be avoided. > > Can anyone comment? There's a general principle when reading the C standard, which is, when looking at some leaf section, go up the tree and read the parent section, and also read the grandparent section, and so on. In N1256, strrchr() is defined in 7.21.5.5, and strlen() is defined in 7.21.6.3. Both 7.21.5 and 7.21.6 are empty (except for subsections), as is 7.21 itself, but directly underneath section 7.21 is section 7.21.1 "String function conventions", two paragraphs long, and this section does mention null arguments. As it turns out neither of these paragraphs addresses your question specifically, but the second paragraph does mention 7.1.4, where an answer may be found. So if the general principle mentioned above had been followed, there is a reasonable chance you would have found an answer without having to ask. Incidentally, I learned this principle myself from another helpful poster (I don't remember who) in comp.lang.c, and am happy to pass along what has been for me helpful advice.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
A question regarding C string functions Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-04-02 18:11 +0000
Re: A question regarding C string functions Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-04-02 18:33 +0000
Re: A question regarding C string functions Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-04-02 18:36 +0000
Re: A question regarding C string functions David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-04-03 09:29 +0200
Re: A question regarding C string functions Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-04-02 17:36 -0700
Re: A question regarding C string functions Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-04-03 02:13 +0000
Re: A question regarding C string functions Ethan Carter <ec1828@somewhere.edu> - 2025-04-03 18:54 -0300
Re: A question regarding C string functions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-04-03 00:36 -0400
csiph-web