Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #126422
| From | GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c, comp.std.c |
| Subject | Re: What happened to short float? |
| Date | 2018-02-08 09:54 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20180208095429.606364963470edfaf0cc3206@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <ef0ada5f-6cbd-a060-fab8-894272f9b914@verizon.net> <p52ngk$evf$1@dont-email.me> <fdr6e4Fp1fcU1@mid.individual.net> <20180208012936.09fa549ce0fe0785da7cf560@gmail.com> <lnk1voz46u.fsf@kst-u.example.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Wed, 07 Feb 2018 16:59:53 -0800 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote: > Wouldn't you need extra code to convert between 16-bit and 32-bit > formats? For normal values you'd need to do some bit-twiddling. > Special values like infinities, NaNs, subnormals, and so forth might > require some extra work (I haven't looked into the details). No. Supporting the short float type for computing purpose doesn't mean you have to implement the half floating point format. Since the IEEE 754 standard requires only the implementation of the single precision float format, any compliant hardware could implement the short float type as a single precision float. Hardware with a full specific half float support could provide more performance. > > typedef char half_t[2]; > > (I'd use uint16_t, or at least unsigned char[2] rather than char[2].) I agree, the object should be stored at least as unsigned char[2]. > Sure, if you have a CPU instruction that does the conversion, it's > easy. Not really. The F16C instruction set for example only provides the conversion to half precision float but not the arithmetic. Consequently, the implementation should distinguish the storage format from the computing format such as: typedef unsigned char half_t[2]; typedef float sflt_t; sflt_t *htosf(half_t *x); half_t *sftoh(sflt_t *x); > If you don't, it's not prohitively difficult, but it's not quite as > obvious that it's worth the effort. As already said, there's no need to implement the half precision format. The short float type should only provide hardware acceleration when available. -- GOTHIER Nathan
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: What happened to short float? jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2018-02-02 23:08 +0100
Re: What happened to short float? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> - 2018-02-05 07:57 +0100
Re: What happened to short float? jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2018-02-05 05:31 -0800
Re: What happened to short float? Tim Prince <tprince@intelretiree.com> - 2018-02-05 08:55 -0500
Re: What happened to short float? jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2018-02-05 15:46 +0100
Re: What happened to short float? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2018-02-08 01:29 +0100
Re: What happened to short float? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-07 16:59 -0800
Re: What happened to short float? Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-02-08 09:08 +0100
Re: What happened to short float? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-08 09:27 -0800
Re: What happened to short float? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2018-02-08 09:54 +0100
Re: What happened to short float? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-08 10:13 -0800
Re: What happened to short float? jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2018-02-08 06:36 -0800
Re: What happened to short float? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2018-02-08 17:04 +0100
Re: What happened to short float? jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2018-02-08 08:56 -0800
Re: What happened to short float? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2018-02-08 17:23 +0000
Re: What happened to short float? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2018-02-08 18:52 +0100
Re: What happened to short float? jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2018-02-08 11:27 -0800
Re: What happened to short float? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2018-02-08 22:58 +0100
Re: What happened to short float? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-08 10:18 -0800
Re: What happened to short float? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> - 2018-02-08 18:59 +0100
Re: What happened to short float? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-02-08 16:22 -0600
Re: What happened to short float? Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com> - 2018-02-09 15:01 +0100
csiph-web