Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c.moderated > #471
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c.moderated |
| Subject | Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? |
| Date | 2013-09-11 17:26 -0500 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <clcm-20130911-0002@plethora.net> (permalink) |
| References | <clcm-20130104-0002@plethora.net> <clcm-20130902-0002@plethora.net> <clcm-20130906-0002@plethora.net> |
James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> writes:
> On 09/02/2013 05:07 AM, kzelechowski@e3tech.local wrote:
>> (sizeof main == 1) because (main) is treated as a logical value. Compare:
>> { if (main) yadda; }
>
> Why are you resurrecting a thread that started eight months ago, and was
> completely resolved six months ago?
>
> The behavior of an if() statement depends upon whether the if-condition
> compares equal to 0. You could think of if(main) as if it evaluates
> main==0, though that's not how the C standard describes it.
Or you could think of it as if it evaluates main!=0 -- which very nearly
is how the C standard describes it:
In both forms [of the "if" statement], the first substatement is
executed if the expression compares unequal to 0
Since the expression main decays to a pointer, the 0 is treated as a
null pointer constant and is converted to the same pointer type.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
--
comp.lang.c.moderated - moderation address: clcm@plethora.net -- you must
have an appropriate newsgroups line in your header for your mail to be seen,
or the newsgroup name in square brackets in the subject line. Sorry.
Back to comp.lang.c.moderated | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Why sizeof(main) = 1? Myth__Buster <raghavanil4m@gmail.com> - 2013-01-04 18:14 -0600
Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2013-02-26 10:51 -0600
Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-03-11 18:25 -0500
Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2013-02-26 10:51 -0600
Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? gordonb.k8xjg@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2013-02-26 10:51 -0600
Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? <kzelechowski@e3tech.local> - 2013-09-02 04:07 -0500
Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-09-06 23:25 -0500
Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-09-11 17:26 -0500
Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-09-12 11:29 -0500
Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-09-06 23:25 -0500
Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2013-09-11 17:27 -0500
Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-09-12 11:29 -0500
Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-09-12 11:30 -0500
Re: Why sizeof(main) = 1? Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2013-09-06 23:25 -0500
csiph-web