Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #119511
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c, comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? |
| Date | 2024-06-22 13:20 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <v57bna$3tkcl$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <v56lar$onl4$7@i2pn2.org> <v56uij$3rako$1@dont-email.me> <v573d1$3s8q3$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v5780h$3t1bd$1@dont-email.me> <v57bcj$onl4$13@i2pn2.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 6/22/2024 1:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 6/22/24 3:17 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 6/22/2024 10:58 AM, Bonita Montero wrote: >>> Am 22.06.2024 um 18:36 schrieb olcott: >>> >>>> It seems pretty stupid to allow gaps in the semantics of C++ >>>> programs. Simply specify that the order of evaluation is left to >>>> right unless: >>>> (a) Otherwise specified such as operator precedence rules. >>>> (b) Derives the same result as left to right ordering. >>> >>> Most UB is there to allow optimizations, also in this case. >>> I've got no problem with that. >>> >>> >> >> Humm. Sounds reasonable. UB is there to be defined by a non-conforming >> compiler? ;^) > > Doesn't need to be Non-Conforming to define the behavior of Undefined > Behavior! > > Think of a system that takes advantage of UB. Remember way back when standard C did not know about threads, ahhh... We had POSIX?
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-16 22:47 -0500
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-17 16:11 +0200
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-17 09:26 -0500
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-19 11:03 -0500
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-21 16:41 -0500
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-06-22 11:13 +0100
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 07:42 -0500
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 09:58 -0400
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 11:36 -0500
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 13:20 -0400
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 20:00 +0200
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 14:50 -0400
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 08:52 +0200
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 07:38 -0400
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-23 14:38 +0200
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 19:58 +0200
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 12:17 -0700
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 16:15 -0400
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 13:20 -0700
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 13:26 -0700
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-06-22 17:49 -0400
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-23 14:43 +0200
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-06-23 14:30 +0200
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 18:32 +0200
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2024-06-26 13:09 -0400
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 19:42 +0200
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 11:54 -0700
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2024-06-27 08:51 -0400
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-27 13:51 -0700
Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 20:22 -0500
csiph-web