Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #5884
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.249.MISMATCH!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit4.readnews.com!panix!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: implicit promotion |
| Date | Tue, 31 May 2011 00:52:13 -0400 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Lines | 10 |
| Message-ID | <is1s5u$1ma$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <irusp0$6pi$1@reader1.panix.com> <Xns9EF5E0E419D65myfirstnameosapriee@216.196.109.131> <2011053009235252042-pete@versatilecodingcom> <is1fvt$pn2$1@reader1.panix.com> <94iul5Fr2iU14@mid.individual.net> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | www2.mrbrklyn.com |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | reader1.panix.com 1306817534 1738 96.57.23.82 (31 May 2011 04:52:14 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@panix.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 31 May 2011 04:52:14 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 SUSE/3.1.10 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
| In-Reply-To | <94iul5Fr2iU14@mid.individual.net> |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:5884 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 05/30/2011 09:30 PM, Ian Collins wrote: >> These are both huge problems that really shouldn't happen. It's crazy. >> You have to do 3 *(1.0f/3.0f) in order to get a mathmatically valid >> calculation that a standard calculator does. > > Why is it crazy? Integer arithmetic is well defined. Would you have > the language magically assume you wanted a floating point result? somehow i knew that would have been the answer
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
implicit promotion Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-05-30 01:44 +0000
Re: implicit promotion red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2011-05-29 20:35 -0700
Re: implicit promotion ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-05-30 00:01 -0400
Re: implicit promotion Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-30 16:08 +1200
Re: implicit promotion Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-05-30 01:18 -0500
Re: implicit promotion Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-05-30 11:45 +0000
Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 05:49 -0700
Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 08:58 -1000
Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 12:01 -0700
Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 12:07 -0700
Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:07 -1000
Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 12:13 -0700
Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:27 -1000
Re: implicit promotion Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-05-30 10:17 -0500
Re: implicit promotion Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-05-30 18:20 +0000
Re: implicit promotion Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-05-30 14:06 -0500
Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:23 -1000
Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:29 -1000
Re: implicit promotion Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-05-31 01:24 +0000
Re: implicit promotion Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-31 13:30 +1200
Re: implicit promotion ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-05-31 00:52 -0400
Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 17:36 -1000
Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 11:39 -0700
Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:02 -1000
csiph-web