Re: implicit promotion

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!not-for-mail
From	Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: implicit promotion
Date	Tue, 31 May 2011 01:24:13 +0000 (UTC)
Organization	PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines	11
Message-ID	<is1fvt$pn2$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References	<irusp0$6pi$1@reader1.panix.com> <Xns9EF5E0E419D65myfirstnameosapriee@216.196.109.131> <2011053009235252042-pete@versatilecodingcom>
NNTP-Posting-Host	www2.mrbrklyn.com
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	reader1.panix.com 1306805053 26338 96.57.23.82 (31 May 2011 01:24:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date	Tue, 31 May 2011 01:24:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Blackjet	Blackjet is a Yankee Fan
X-DRMisTHEFT	Use GNU Linux today
X-From	A Dark Cloud
X-LOCATION	Brooklyn NY - Forget abou' it!
X-NYLXS	Really - yah think computers are supposed to be broken?
User-Agent	Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:5859

Show key headers only | View raw

On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:23:52 -1000, Pete Becker wrote:

> Nobody's bothered by 3*(1/3) not being 1, but somehow there's a
> perception that there's something unsavory about 10*(1.0/10.0) not
> having to be 1, even though it's exactly the same issue.

These are both huge problems that really shouldn't happen.  It's crazy.
You have to do 3 *(1.0f/3.0f) in order to get a mathmatically valid 
calculation that a standard calculator does.

Just nuts...

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

implicit promotion Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-05-30 01:44 +0000
  Re: implicit promotion red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2011-05-29 20:35 -0700
    Re: implicit promotion ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-05-30 00:01 -0400
      Re: implicit promotion Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-30 16:08 +1200
        Re: implicit promotion Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-05-30 01:18 -0500
          Re: implicit promotion Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-05-30 11:45 +0000
            Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 05:49 -0700
              Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 08:58 -1000
                Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 12:01 -0700
                Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 12:07 -0700
                Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:07 -1000
                Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 12:13 -0700
                Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:27 -1000
            Re: implicit promotion Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-05-30 10:17 -0500
              Re: implicit promotion Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-05-30 18:20 +0000
                Re: implicit promotion Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-05-30 14:06 -0500
                Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:23 -1000
                Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:29 -1000
                Re: implicit promotion Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-05-31 01:24 +0000
                Re: implicit promotion Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-31 13:30 +1200
                Re: implicit promotion ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-05-31 00:52 -0400
                Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 17:36 -1000
              Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 11:39 -0700
                Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:02 -1000

csiph-web