Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #120430
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons |
| Date | 2024-09-28 04:06 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86setk3um7.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <87v7yjgyfq.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <8634lm73jc.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240926202050.00002d46@yahoo.com> <86tte25n9h.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240927162713.000060ea@yahoo.com> |
Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:38:02 -0700
> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>
>> Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:01:11 -0700
>>> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ... You can,
>>>>>> instead, do this (untested):
>>>>>
>>>>> I should have tested! Of course you have to change the capture
>>>>> (at least for core) from '=' to '&':
>>>>>
>>>>>> #include <functional>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> int floodfill4(
>>>>>> unsigned char *grey,
>>>>>> int width, int height,
>>>>>> int x, int y,
>>>>>> unsigned char target, unsigned char dest)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> if (width < 1 || height < 1)
>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>> if (x < 0 || x >= width || y < 0 || y >= height)
>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> size_t w = width, h = height;
>>>>>> if (grey[y*w+x] != target)
>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> std::function<void(size_t, size_t)> core;
>>>>>> core = [&] (size_t x, size_t y) {
>>>>>
>>>>> Corrected-----^
>>>>
>>>> Why do you think [&] should be used instead of [=]?
>>>
>>> Compiler says that otherwise 'core' captures itself before it
>>> properly initialize.
>>> And indeed, it does not work (Segmentation fault).
>>
>> Ahh. A chicken and egg problem. I sidestepped that by initializing
>> 'core' as part of its declaration (as my other response to Ben
>> shows).
>>
>> No compiler warning, but I didn't try running it.
>
> It does not make any difference. The same crash as before.
Yes, not surprising.
> BTW, I am surprised that your compiler issues no warning.
Probably just an old compiler. I'm not up-to-date with what's
going on with C++ so there isn't much incentive to upgrade.
Trying again with clang I do get a warning.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-09-25 19:54 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-09-25 19:17 +0200
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-09-25 19:55 +0200
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2024-09-25 22:53 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-09-25 23:30 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2024-09-26 00:04 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-09-26 11:17 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2024-09-26 11:25 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-09-26 10:28 +0200
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2024-09-26 11:49 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-09-26 11:38 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-09-25 23:13 +0100
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-09-25 23:28 +0100
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-09-26 10:41 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-09-26 10:29 +0200
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-09-26 11:35 +0200
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-09-26 13:27 +0200
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-09-26 13:31 +0200
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-09-26 15:25 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-09-26 14:58 +0200
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-09-26 16:53 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-09-26 15:54 +0200
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-09-27 16:55 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-09-26 10:01 -0700
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-09-26 19:04 +0200
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-09-26 20:20 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-09-26 10:38 -0700
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-09-27 16:27 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-09-28 04:06 -0700
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-09-26 10:58 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-09-26 10:27 -0700
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-09-26 19:32 +0200
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-09-26 14:09 -0700
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-09-27 16:15 +0300
Re: thread about the pros and cons of lambdas, but more about cons Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-09-28 04:25 -0700
csiph-web