Re: "Current Proposals for C++17"

Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Date	2016-02-28 19:03 -0800
References	<naqk3a$s2i$1@dont-email.me> <naqs3p$j39$1@news.xmission.com> <6cfeec2d-e028-45fe-8ca0-4004b8f236a5@googlegroups.com> <nauac9$ev3$1@dont-email.me>
Message-ID	<3a2d4e93-0097-4458-8195-2ea58c8fbde3@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: "Current Proposals for C++17"
From	Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sunday, February 28, 2016 at 3:19:24 AM UTC-5, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 28.02.16 um 02:25 schrieb woodbrian77@gmail.com:
> >
> > Please don't swear here.
> >
> I don't understand, why you oppose against fucking.

Just guessing, but I don't think he's objecting to the word as such, I think 
what he's objecting to is the dilution of the word, such as in "Fuck!" after 
hitting your thumb with a hammer. The counter argument, of course, is that 
research shows that the hypoalgesic effect of swearing can help reduce the 
sensation of pain, c.f https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypoalgesic_effect_of_swearing.

Daniel

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

"Current Proposals for C++17" Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2016-02-26 16:40 -0600
  Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2016-02-26 17:51 -0500
  Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-02-26 23:21 +0000
  Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2016-02-27 00:54 +0000
    Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 05:19 +0100
      Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-02-27 14:41 +0100
        Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-02-27 08:45 -0800
          Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-02-28 16:43 +0100
            Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-02-28 10:24 -0800
      Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-02-27 19:41 +0100
        Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-02-27 11:23 -0800
          Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-02-28 22:18 +0100
            Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-02-28 14:27 -0800
              Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-03-06 20:10 +0100
                Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-03-06 11:59 -0800
                Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-03-06 21:57 +0100
                Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-03-06 13:49 -0800
                Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 17:51 +0000
                Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-03-06 17:02 -0800
                C++ style varies widely (was: "Current Proposals for C++17") legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2016-03-07 16:48 +0000
        Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2016-03-01 06:55 +0000
          Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-03-06 21:03 +0100
            Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2016-03-07 17:03 +0000
    Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-02-27 17:25 -0800
      Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-02-28 02:15 +0000
        Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 07:33 +0000
          Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-02-28 19:42 +0000
            Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 21:04 +0000
            Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-29 10:18 +1300
      Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-02-28 09:19 +0100
        Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-28 14:05 -0800
        Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 19:03 -0800
          Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-02-29 09:04 +0100
            Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 11:21 +0100
              Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 02:46 -0800
                Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2016-02-29 22:19 -0800
                Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-03-01 09:27 +0100
                Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 05:20 -0800
      Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2016-03-01 06:57 +0000
        Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-03-01 09:51 -0800
          Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-03-01 18:08 +0000
          Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-03-01 20:07 +0100
          Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2016-03-01 20:17 +0000
    Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2016-02-28 18:26 +0000
      Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" red floyd <no.spam@its.invalid> - 2016-02-29 10:09 -0800
  Re: "Current Proposals for C++17" scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-29 14:29 +0000

csiph-web