Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #2010 > unrolled thread

Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic

Started byRudolf Harras <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com>
First post2014-03-23 10:55 +0100
Last post2014-04-30 00:47 +0200
Articles 4 on this page of 24 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc


Contents

  Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Rudolf Harras <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com> - 2014-03-23 10:55 +0100
    Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-03-23 09:23 -0400
      Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Rudolf Harras <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com> - 2014-03-23 16:04 +0100
        Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-03-23 12:19 -0400
      Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2014-03-24 13:02 -0600
        Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-03-24 19:25 -0400
          Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2014-03-24 20:37 -0600
        Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-03-25 10:01 -0400
          Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2014-03-25 17:12 -0600
            Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Schmidt <ng@vbRichClient.com> - 2014-03-31 01:09 +0200
        Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Rudolf Harras <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com> - 2014-03-25 23:12 +0100
          Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2014-03-25 17:19 -0600
            Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Rudolf Harras <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com> - 2014-03-26 01:28 +0100
              Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2014-03-25 20:55 -0600
                Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Rudolf Harras <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com> - 2014-03-26 11:06 +0100
                  Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-03-26 08:51 -0400
                    Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Rudolf Harras <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com> - 2014-04-13 02:11 +0200
                      Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic "Farnsworth" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2014-04-12 23:52 -0400
                        Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2014-04-14 09:01 +0100
                          Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic "Farnsworth" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2014-04-15 04:56 -0400
                            Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2014-04-15 10:10 +0100
                            Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Rudolf Harras <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com> - 2014-04-30 00:43 +0200
                        Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Rudolf Harras <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com> - 2014-04-30 00:41 +0200
                      Re: Windows 8 Apps with Visual Basic Rudolf Harras <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com> - 2014-04-30 00:47 +0200

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#2030

FromDeanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk>
Date2014-04-15 10:10 +0100
Message-ID<liit2u$s6e$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#2029
On 15/04/2014 09:56, Farnsworth wrote:
> "Deanna Earley" <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:lig4ke$qbs$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 13/04/2014 04:52, Farnsworth wrote:
>>> "Rudolf Harras" <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com> wrote in message
>>> news:licko0$rq1$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> Mayayana schrieb:
>>>>> Hopefully this is a project for yourself, for the fun of it.
>>>>
>>>> Sure. But it's even more confusing now.
>>>>
>>>> There is Windows Phone 8 SDK. But this seems to work only for 64bit
>>>> Windows 8:
>>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19055676/can-i-install-windows-phone-sdk-8-0-on-windows-8-pro-32-bit-computer
>>>>
>>>> So... all Microsoft did here is really confusing.
>>>
>>> Wrong group. Try posting here:
>>
>> Why?
>> The charter here doesn't exclude any particular variant and is explicitly
>> listed as:
>> "...will be a place for any discussions of topics which are not covered by
>> the other three groups."
>> (No matter that it pre-dated .Net)
>>
>> The OP wanted to do it with VB (unspecified variant), and so fits inside
>> the charter.
>
> That was written in 1994, long before MS made the two products distinct,
> answers for one almost always does not apply to the other.

That doesn't change the fact it's still a BASIC or Visual Basic variant
Feel free to post a newer version of the charter though.

-- 
Deanna Earley (dee.earley@icode.co.uk)
iCatcher Development Team
http://www.icode.co.uk/icatcher/

iCode Systems

(Replies direct to my email address will be printed, shredded then fed 
to the rats. Please reply to the group.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2038

FromRudolf Harras <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com>
Date2014-04-30 00:43 +0200
Message-ID<ljp9ur$ptl$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#2029
Farnsworth schrieb:
> That was written in 1994, long before MS made the two products distinct, 
> answers for one almost always does not apply to the other.

So what you are saying is:
"Usenet Newsgroups are dead - there won't be any new groups and we will
only continue using it for old stuff". Well then they'll be dead for sure...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2037

FromRudolf Harras <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com>
Date2014-04-30 00:41 +0200
Message-ID<ljp9rl$ptl$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#2027
Farnsworth schrieb:
> Wrong group. Try posting here:
> 
> http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=vbgeneral

This isn't even a group, this is a WWW-forum.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2039

FromRudolf Harras <rudi007@temporaryforwarding.com>
Date2014-04-30 00:47 +0200
Message-ID<ljpa6t$sm4$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#2026
So I found something new:
http://readwrite.com/2014/04/03/microsoft-universal-windows-app-store-developers-unified-code-base#awesm=~oCf5yNisHzKkoK

"Universal Windows Apps" should make it possible to write "apps" for
both Windows Phone and Windows 8.1 (on desktop).

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.basic.visual.misc


csiph-web